California faces a daunting budget crisis following the negative result of the May 19, 2009 election. The Governor has only a limited field of action given political and constitutional realities. One option open to him is negotiations with local governments in which greater autonomy in expenditure or taxation could be exchanged for current dollars. While such a trade could be proposed to all local governments, the limited time left for the Governor suggests that the cities may be most appropriate partners. Exchanges that free cities from spending restrictions or open new tax preserves to them could lower the current deficit and strengthen home rule, which was weakened by Proposition 13.

Managing Editor: Lubenow, Gerald
Ed. by Citrin, Jack / Cain, Bruce / Noll, Roger
4 Issues per year
Issues
Volume 5 (2013)
Volume 4 (2012)
Volume 3 (2011)
Volume 2 (2010)
Most Downloaded Articles
- California: A Failed State or Too Big to Fail? by Korey, John L
- Changing Tracks? The Prospect for California Pension Reform by Kogan, Vladimir and McCubbins, Mathew D
- Medicaid Expansion and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Lessons and Hopes for Implementation of Healthcare Reform by Kieber-Emmons, Autumn/ Bodenheimer, Thomas and Grumbach, Kevin
- Why California’s ‘Three Strikes’ Fails as Crime and Economic Policy, and What to Do by Parker, Robert Nash
- Give States a Way to Go Bankrupt: It's the Best Option for Avoiding a Massive Federal Bailout by Skeel, David A.
The Governor Should Negotiate with the Cities
Robert R Benedetti
1University of the Pacific
Citation Information: California Journal of Politics and Policy. Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1944-4370, DOI: 10.2202/1944-4370.1038, June 2009
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2009-06-15


















Comments (0)