Washington�s experience with primary elections provides an opportunity to assess issues associated with implementing the top two primary and an opportunity to examine how changing to a top two primary may affect elections and voting. Although the Washington context is different from California (top two replaced an open partisan primary in Washington, rather than a closed partisan primary), Washington�s experience suggests the effects of this reform have been rather limited. There may have been a slight increase in turnout and a minor increase in campaign expenditure after changing to top two, but it is difficult to link these changes to the primary system. Whatever the cause of the changes, the partisan structure of Washington�s legislature appears unaltered by the new primary system.

Managing Editor: Lubenow, Gerald
Ed. by Citrin, Jack / Cain, Bruce / Noll, Roger
4 Issues per year
Issues
Volume 5 (2013)
Volume 4 (2012)
Volume 3 (2011)
Volume 2 (2010)
Most Downloaded Articles
- California: A Failed State or Too Big to Fail? by Korey, John L
- Changing Tracks? The Prospect for California Pension Reform by Kogan, Vladimir and McCubbins, Mathew D
- Why California’s ‘Three Strikes’ Fails as Crime and Economic Policy, and What to Do by Parker, Robert Nash
- Medicaid Expansion and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Lessons and Hopes for Implementation of Healthcare Reform by Kieber-Emmons, Autumn/ Bodenheimer, Thomas and Grumbach, Kevin
- Give States a Way to Go Bankrupt: It's the Best Option for Avoiding a Massive Federal Bailout by Skeel, David A.
The Top Two Primary: What Can California Learn from Washington?
Todd Donovan
1Western Washington University
Citation Information: California Journal of Politics and Policy. Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 1–22, ISSN (Online) 1944-4370, DOI: 10.1515/1944-4370.1196, February 2012
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2012-02-24
Keywords: electoral reform; voter turnout; primary elections


















Comments (0)