Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
September 2007
ISSN:
1613-3641
DOI:
10.1515/COG.2007.005

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 480.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 721.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 576.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 866.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Dabrowska, Ewa

4 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 1.00
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.624
Rank 41 out of 161 in category Linguistics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective

1 / Melissa Bowerman2 / Miriam van Staden3 / James S Boster4

1

2

3

4

cor1*Any correspondence should be addressed to Asifa Majid,

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 133–152, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: 10.1515/COG.2007.005, September 2007

Publication History:
Received:
2006-02-17
Revised:
2006-12-08
Published Online:
2007-09-25

Abstract

This special issue of Cognitive Linguistics explores the linguistic encoding of events of cutting and breaking. In this article we first introduce the project on which it is based by motivating the selection of this conceptual domain, presenting the methods of data collection used by all the investigators, and characterizing the language sample. We then present a new approach to examining crosslinguistic similarities and differences in semantic categorization. Applying statistical modeling to the descriptions of cutting and breaking events elicited from speakers of all the languages, we show that although there is crosslinguistic variation in the number of distinctions made and in the placement of category boundaries, these differences take place within a strongly constrained semantic space: across languages, there is a surprising degree of consensus on the partitioning of events in this domain. In closing, we compare our statistical approach with more conventional semantic analyses, and show how an extensional semantic typological approach like the one illustrated here can help illuminate the intensional distinctions made by languages.

Keywords: cut and break; separation events; verb semantics; categorization; extension; intension; typology; semantic map

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.