Abstract
This paper provides responses to the points raised in this volume in an effort to evaluate, clarify and extend some of the arguments in Constructions at Work.

Editor-in-Chief: Dabrowska, Ewa
4 Issues per year
Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 1.00
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.624
Rank 41 out of 161 in category Linguistics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition
ERIH category 2011: INT1
1Princeton University
Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 201–224, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: 10.1515/COGL.2009.013, February 2009
This paper provides responses to the points raised in this volume in an effort to evaluate, clarify and extend some of the arguments in Constructions at Work.
Keywords:: constructionist approach; argument structure constructions; learning; categorization; island constraints; subject auxiliary inversion; argument realization; usage-based; universal grammar hypothesis
Comments (0)