Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
November 2010
ISSN:
1613-3641
DOI:
10.1515/cogl.2010.024

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 480.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 721.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 576.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 866.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Dabrowska, Ewa

4 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 1.00
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.624
Rank 41 out of 161 in category Linguistics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Metaphor in usage

Gerard J. Steen1 / Aletta G. Dorst1 / J. Berenike Herrmann1 / Anna A. Kaal1 / Tina Krennmayr1

1VU University Amsterdam

c1Address for correspondence: Gerard Steen, Department of Language and Communication, Faculty of Arts, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands. T: ++31-20-5986433. F: ++31-20-5986500. E-mail:

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 765–796, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: 10.1515/cogl.2010.024, November 2010

Publication History:
Received:
2009-05-25
Revised:
2010-05-21
Published Online:
2010-11-04

Abstract

This paper examines patterns of metaphor in usage. Four samples of text excerpts of on average 47,000 words each were taken from the British National Corpus and annotated for metaphor. The linguistic metaphor data were collected by five analysts on the basis of a highly explicit identification procedure that is a variant of the approach developed by the Pragglejaz Group (Metaphor and Symbol 22: 1–39, 2007). Part of this paper is a report of the protocol and the reliability of the procedure.

Data analysis shows that, on average, one in every seven and a half lexical units in the corpus is related to metaphor defined as a potential cross-domain mapping in conceptual structure. It also appears that the bulk of the expression of metaphor in discourse consists of non-signalled metaphorically used words, not similes. The distribution of metaphor-related words, finally, turns out to be quite variable between the four registers examined in this study: academic texts have 18.5%, news 16.4%, fiction 11.7%, and conversation 7.7%. The systematic comparative investigation of these registers raises new questions about the relation between cognitive linguistic and other approaches to metaphor.

Keywords:: BNC-Baby; metaphor; metaphor identification; text annotation; register; simile

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.