Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2011
ISSN:
1613-3641
DOI:
10.1515/cogl.2011.004

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 480.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 721.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 576.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 866.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Editor-in-Chief: Dabrowska, Ewa

4 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 1.00
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.624
Rank 41 out of 161 in category Linguistics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Motivating non-canonicality in Construction Grammar: The case of locative inversion

1Goethe University Frankfurt

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 81–105, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: 10.1515/cogl.2011.004, May 2011

Publication History:
Received:
2010-02-16
Revised:
2010-08-07
Published Online:
2011-05-17

Abstract

This article discusses the English construction variously known as Locative Inversion or Stylistic Inversion. It shows that the construction displays a unique ensemble of grammatical and usage properties that can be stated but not motivated through purely grammatical means. In search of an explanatory approach, an analysis is presented that draws on concepts of Artificial Intelligence, in particular plans viewed as complex mental attitudes. It is claimed that utterances of Locative Inversion are associated with a particular communicative plan on the speaker's part that motivates the grammatical and usage properties of the construction where grammar alone cannot. The final section of the article presents corpus examples showing that Locative Inversion is indeed used in the contexts predicted by the plan associated with the construction. This result is both theoretically and methodologically significant, insofar as it constitutes a case where the grammatical properties of a syntactic construction are better explained through its typical conditions of use than through grammatical means proper.

Keywords:: constructions; discourse motivation; locative inversion; plans

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.