Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

58,00 € / $81.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added.
Publication Date:
11 10 2011
ISSN:
1613-3641
DOI:
10.1515/cogl.2011.027

See all formats and pricing

Print
List price
Euro [D] 457.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 686.00 *
Online
List price
Euro [D] 58.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 81.00 *
Print + Online
List price
Euro [D] 526.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 789.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added.

Editor-in-Chief: Dabrowska, Ewa

4 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2010: 1.021
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.717
Rank 41 out of 141 in category Linguistics in the 2010 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

ERIH category 2011: INT1

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Grammatical profiles and the interaction of the lexicon with aspect, tense, and mood in Russian

1University of Tromsø

c1Address for correspondence: Laura Janda, HSL-fakultetet, Universitetet i Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. Web: http://hum.uit.no/lajanda/.

c2Address for correspondence: Olga Lyashevskaya, Faculty of Philology, Higher School of Economics, 101000 Moscow.

Publication History:

Received: 11/02/2010;
Accepted: 30/01/2011;
Published Online: 26/02/2012

Abstract

We propose the “grammatical profile” as a means of probing the aspectual behavior of verbs. A grammatical profile is the relative frequency distribution of the inflected forms of a word in a corpus. The grammatical profiles of Russian verbs provide data on two crucial issues: a) the overall relationship between perfective and imperfective verbs and b) the identification of verbs that characterize various intersections of aspect, tense and mood (TAM) with lexical classes. There is a long-standing debate over whether Russian aspectual “pairs” are formed only via suffixation (the Isacenko hypothesis) or whether they are formed via both suffixation and prefixation (the traditional view). We test the Isacenko hypothesis using data on the corpus frequency of inflected forms of verbs. We find that the behavior of perfective and imperfective verbs is the same regardless of whether the aspectual relationship is marked by prefixes or suffixes; our finding thus supports the traditional view.

Introspective descriptions of Russian aspect have often connected the use of particular inflectional forms with certain uses of aspect; for example, the use of imperative forms with the imperfective aspect to produce expressions that are very polite. Grammatical profiles make it possible to identify verbs that behave as outliers, presenting unusually large proportions of usage in parts of the paradigm. This analysis both gives substance to and extends previous introspective descriptions by identifying the verbs most involved in certain TAM-category interactions. On a methodological level, this study contributes to current discussions on the use of inflected forms vs. lemmas in corpus studies. Newman (Aiming low in linguistics: Low-level generalizations in corpus-based research: National Chiao Tung University, 2008) finds valuable information at the level of the inflectional form, and Gries (forthcoming) argues that inflectional forms do not necessarily provide a better basis for analysis than lemmas. We agree with them that the appropriate level of granularity is determined by both the language and the linguistic phenomenon under analysis.

Keywords:: Aspect ; tense ; mood ; corpus linguistics ; quantitative analysis ; Russian

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.