CMT and the 'Work' of Metaphor : Cognitive Semiotics

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

CMT and the 'Work' of Metaphor

1Jagiellonian University, Kraków

Citation Information: Cognitive Semiotics. Volume 5, Issue 1-2, Pages 153–178, ISSN (Online) 2235-2066, DOI: 10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.153, January 2014

Publication History

Published Online:
2014-01-18

Abstract

I propose to show that, in their Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), Lakoff and his collaborators do not offer a new account of metaphor but rather a wide-ranging representation of analogies, reconstructed on the basis of selected linguistic material (primarily collocations and idioms). Consequently, CMT is valuable not as an explanation of metaphorical language in use, nor a hypothesis about the genesis and development of concepts in individual minds, but primarily as a way to represent the results of unexplored social processes of lexicalization involving metaphor. If one adopts a more 'ecological', situated perspective, this global, post hoc approach may perhaps provide useful material to speculate on the forces that drive meaning extension in history.

Keywords : conceptual metaphor; analogy; concept formation; blending; linguistic mentalism; stereotype; primacy of metaphor

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.