Volume 7 (2014)
Volume 6 (2010)
Volume 4 (2009)
Volume 3 (2008)
Volume 2 (2008)
Volume 1 (2007)
Most Downloaded Articles
- The Artification Hypothesis and Its Relevance to Cognitive Science, Evolutionary Aesthetics, and Neuroaesthetics by Dissanayake, Ellen
- Introduction: Thirty Years After by Fusaroli, Riccardo and Morgagni, Simone
- Metaphor and the Communicative Mind by Brandt, Line
- Why Do Some People Dislike Conceptual Metaphor Theory? by Gibbs, Raymond W.
Deliberate Metaphor Affords Conscious Metaphorical Cognition
1Faculty of Arts, VU University Amsterdam
Citation Information: Cognitive Semiotics. Volume 5, Issue 1-2, Pages 179–197, ISSN (Online) 2235-2066, ISSN (Print) , DOI: 10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.179, January 2014
- Published Online:
Contrary to what is assumed in Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), the conceptual power of metaphor may not lie in its widespread unconscious use but in its more limited and targeted deliberate use, which may or may not give rise to conscious metaphorical cognition. Deliberate and conscious metaphorical thought is connected to the general functions of all conscious thought as described by Baumeister and Masicampo (2010). Their theory provides a basis for demonstrating how deliberate and conscious metaphorical cognition facilitate social and cultural interactions, by reconsidering Musolff’s (2004) analysis of metaphor in political discourse on European integration. The paper concludes by formulating some implications of CMT’s neglect of conscious metaphor and of deliberate metaphor more generally. If the power of metaphor lies in thought, as has been held by CMT for thirty years, it may be that conscious rather than unconscious cognition - or, more generally, deliberate rather than non-deliberate metaphor use - enables that power. Given the relative infrequency of deliberate and conscious metaphor use, this, in turn, may entail that the online effect of metaphor is more restricted than has been assumed over the past three decades.