Most Downloaded Articles
- What healthcare students do with what they don't know: The socializing power of ‘uncertainty’ in the case presentation by Spafford, Marlee M/ Schryer, Catherine F/ Lingard, Lorelei and Hrynchak, Patricia K
- The unjust world problem: A response to Elliot Mishler by Williams, Gareth
- Community as a key to healing after the death of a child by Hastings, Sally O/ Musambira, George W and Hoover, Judith D
- Multilingualism and healthcare in Nigeria: A management perspective by Antia, Bassey E. and Bertin, Fankep D. A.
- Editorial: Interactional expertise in healthcare encounters by Sarangi, Srikant
When talking to the patient is difficult: The physician's perspective
Citation Information: Communication & Medicine. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 69–76, ISSN (Online) 1613-3625, ISSN (Print) 1612-1783, DOI: 10.1515/come.2005.2.1.69, July 2005
- Published Online:
The aim of the study was to analyze the difficult doctor–patient relationship from a doctor's perspective. A qualitative–interpretative approach was employed to analyze representations of difficult visits collected by means of written narrations. Two main scenarios were identified: (i) a ‘personal scenario’ in which the doctor had difficulties from a purely personal perspective; and (ii) a ‘professional scenario’ in which the doctor had difficulties as a professional when the ‘other’ resists or in facing the ‘other’ who resists. A further scenario was identified in which problems were generated by the family of the patient. Results suggest that the relation between doctor and patient may be very complex. Difficulties may be internal to the doctor, hence intra-psychic, depending on being both a professional and a human being. Difficulties may also be external between two psychological subjects (labeled as inter-psychic), where interaction of the ‘you’ and the ‘other’ becomes a battleground, a wall of opposition, or alternatively a place of experimentation with relationships. Furthermore, external difficulties may also be between more than two persons (labeled as inter-personal), by the possible multiplicity of the ‘other’. This happens in particular when the ‘other’ is represented by the family.