Most Downloaded Articles
- Professional-patient communication in the treatment of mental illness: A review by Hassan, Imren/ McCabe, Rosemarie and Priebe, Stefan
- Negotiating frame ambiguity: A study of simulated encounters in medical education by Seale, Clive/ Butler, Christopher C/ Hutchby, Ian/ Kinnersley, Paul and Rollnick, Stephen
- The construction of identity during group therapy among adults with traumatic brain injury by Kovarsky, Dana/ Shaw, Allan and Adingono-Smith, Maureen
- Lexical conflation and edible iconicity: Two sources of ambiguity in American vernacular health terminology by Stvan, Laurel Smith
- Adapting to conversation as a language-impaired speaker: Changes in aphasic turn construction over time by Wilkinson, Ray/ Gower, Morwenna/ Beeke, Suzanne and Maxim, Jane
The deep play of medicine: Discursive and collaborative processing of evidence in medical problem solving
Citation Information: Communication & Medicine. Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 43–54, ISSN (Online) 1613-3625, ISSN (Print) 1612-1783, DOI: 10.1515/CAM.2006.005, June 2006
- Published Online:
Ethnographic research was conducted in the thoracic ward of a Norwegian university hospital in order to study collaborative medical problem solving. As a general principle, evidence-based medicine is supposed to lead the process of medical problem solving. However, medical problem solving also requires evidence of a different kind. This is the more concrete form of evidence, such as X rays and other representations, that guides medical practice and makes sure that decisions are grounded in sound empirical facts and knowledge. In medicine, ‘evidence’ is on the one hand an abstract category; on the other hand, it is a tool that is practically enacted during the problem-solving work. Medical evidence does not ‘show itself’. As such it has an emergent quality. Medical evidence has to be established and made practically useful in the collaborative settings by the participants in order to make conclusions about diagnoses and treatment. Hence, evidence is an interactional product; it is discursively generated and its applicability requires discourse. In addition, the production of medical evidence requires more than medical discourse and professional considerations. This paper looks at the production processes and use of medical evidence and the ambiguous meaning of this term in practical medicine.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.