Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
January 2007
ISSN:
1613-2556
DOI:
10.1515/ECFR.2006.018

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 338.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 507.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 406.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 609.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
VolumeIssuePage

White Knights and Black Knights – Does the Search for Competitive Bids always Benefit the Shareholders of “Target” Companies? –

Citation Information: European Company and Financial Law Review. Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 408–425, ISSN (Online) 1613-2556, ISSN (Print) 1613-2548, DOI: 10.1515/ECFR.2006.018, January 2007

Publication History:
Published Online:
2007-01-26

Abstract

According to the EC Directive on Takeover Bids, defensive measures should be authorised by the general meeting of the target company. The incumbent board can, nonetheless, search for a competing bid, a so-called “white knight”. The rationale underpinning this exception is that competing bids always benefit target's shareholders. In this paper I will tackle this rationale, arguing that even competing bids could generate a pressure to tender on target's shareholders and, therefore, in this case should not be considered as a benefit for them.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.