A Meaningful Second Commitment Period for the Kyoto Protocol : The Economists' Voice

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

The Economists' Voice

Ed. by Cragg, Michael / Jaffee, Dwight / Stiglitz, Joseph / Zwiebel, Jeffrey


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.121
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.088
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.118

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

A Meaningful Second Commitment Period for the Kyoto Protocol

Sheila M Olmstead / Robert N Stavins

Citation Information: The Economists' Voice. Volume 4, Issue 3, ISSN (Online) 1553-3832, DOI: 10.2202/1553-3832.1230, June 2007

Publication History

Published Online:
2007-06-21

Robert Stavins and Sheila Olmstead propose ways to modify the Kyoto Protocol for its second commitment period (2012-2016) so that it will provide a way forward that is scientifically sound, economically rational, and politically pragmatic.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Julie A. Nelson
Ecological Economics, 2008, Volume 65, Number 3, Page 441

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.