Despite achieving a 60-seat majority in the 111th Senate, Democrats were unable to pass many of their key legislative priorities without support from Republicans. The striking inability of Democrats to govern the Senate despite a filibuster-proof majority demonstrates key differences between the chambers of Congress. Whereas party polarization helps the majority party in the House of Representatives to exert more control over the legislative process, in the Senate it aids the minority. Because Republicans viewed the Senate as their main opportunity for hindering the Democratic agenda, the GOP benefitted from their partys ideological cohesion and rules favoring obstruction.

The Forum
A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics
Ed. by Shafer, Byron / DiSalvo, Daniel
4 Issues per year
IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.333
Issues
Volume 11 (2013)
Volume 10 (2012)
Volume 9 (2011)
Volume 8 (2010)
Volume 7 (2009)
Volume 6 (2008)
Volume 5 (2008)
Volume 4 (2006)
Volume 3 (2006)
Volume 2 (2004)
Volume 1 (2003)
Most Downloaded Articles
- If I Could Hold a Seminar for Political Journalists… by Fiorina, Morris P.
- If Everyone Votes Their Party, Why Do Presidential Election Outcomes Vary So Much? by Shaw, Daron
- Independent Leaners as Policy Partisans: An Examination of Party Identification and Policy Views by Magleby, David B. and Nelson, Candice
- Delegation, Control, and the Study of Public Bureaucracy by Moe, Terry M.
- The Disappearing--but Still Important--Swing Voter by Mayer, William G.
Polarization, Obstruction, and Governing in the Senate
Barry C. Burden
1University of Wisconsin-Madison
Citation Information: The Forum. Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, DOI: 10.2202/1540-8884.1480, January 2011
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2011-01-03


















Comments (0)