Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
February 2013
ISSN:
1540-8884
DOI:
10.1515/forum-2013-0001

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 118.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 158.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 142.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 190.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Shafer, Byron / DiSalvo, Daniel

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 0.333

 

VolumeIssuePage

The Presidential Election of 2012 by the Numbers and in Historical Perspective

1Department of Politics, University of Virginia

2Professor of Politics at the University of Virginia, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution

Corresponding author: Verlan Lewis, Department of Politics, University of Virginia

Citation Information: The Forum. Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 29–35, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: 10.1515/forum-2013-0001, February 2013

Publication History:
Published Online:
2013-02-09

Abstract

This essay explores the scope of President Obama’s re-election victory in 2012 by comparing it to previous presidential elections in American history. Three conclusions are drawn. First, Obama’s margin of victory in 2012 is modest by historical standards, though Obama did make history by becoming the first re-elected President to lose both Electoral College votes and popular vote share between his first and second election. Next, despite some claims that challenger Mitt Romney squandered an easy opportunity to win, the historical record of incumbents seeking a second term suggests that the advantage always lay with President Obama. Finally, the 2012 election marked a further step in a changing pattern of presidential elections in which national margins of victory tend to be much smaller, state landslides are more numerous, and swings from one party to another between consecutive presidential elections are minimized.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.