Volume 11 (2013)
Volume 10 (2012)
Volume 9 (2011)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Obstructing Agenda-Setting: Examining Blue Slip Behavior in the Senate by Black, Ryan C./ Madonna, Anthony J. and Owens, Ryan J.
- What the Filibuster Tells Us About the Senate by Schickler, Eric and Wawro, Gregory J.
- The End of the Reform Era? Campaign Finance Retrenchment in the United States and Canada by Boatright, Robert G.
- Why Super PACs: How the American Party System Outgrew the Campaign Finance System by La Raja, Raymond J.
- Candidate Obama and the Dilemmas of Political Time by Crockett, David A.
Negative, Angry, and Ubiquitous: Political Advertising in 2012
1Assistant Professor, Department of Government, Wesleyan University, 238 Church Street, Middletown, CT 06459, USA
2Associate Professor and Thomas S. Foley Distinguished Professor of Government and Public Policy, School of Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Washington State University, Johnson Tower, Troy Lane, Pullman, 99164-4800 Washington, DC, USA
Citation Information: The Forum. Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 51–61, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: 10.1515/forum-2013-0004, February 2013
- Published Online:
Record amounts of money went to purchase television advertising during the 2012 election cycle, resulting in unprecedented volumes of advertising. This increase was due in part to the ease with which outside groups, such as super PACs, were able to raise and spend advertising dollars in the current, post-Citizens United, regulatory regime. Advertising in 2012 was also extremely negative, especially at the presidential level, and frequently evoked the emotion of anger. Yet whether 2012 marks the high point for spending on advertising – and whether the negativity will abate in the next presidential election – remain open questions.