Barking Louder: Interest Groups in the 2012 Election : The Forum Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

The Forum

A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics

Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey


IMPACT FACTOR 2015: 0.250
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.318

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.255
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.296
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.191

49,00 € / $74.00 / £37.00*

Online
ISSN
1540-8884
See all formats and pricing



Select Volume and Issue
Loading journal volume and issue information...

Barking Louder: Interest Groups in the 2012 Election

1Milano School of International Affairs, Urban Management and Public Policy, The New School

2Department of Political Science, University of Missouri, St Louis

Citation Information: The Forum. Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 80–90, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: 10.1515/forum-2013-0012, February 2013

Publication History

Published Online:
2013-02-09

Abstract

This essay compares interest group activity in the 2012 federal elections with the previous two cycles. We examine the role of interest groups in financing campaign activities and influencing voters. Coming in the wake of the Citizens United case and other court decisions that relaxed campaign finance restrictions, the 2012 election marked an explosion of outside spending by organized interests, particularly independent expenditure advertising. While outside spending may not have produced the outcomes some expected in 2012, it blurs the distinction between candidates and outside groups and may be shifting the balance of power in campaigns away from candidates and toward organized interests. We conclude with a series of predictions about the nature of interest group activity in future election cycles.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.