A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics
Ed. by Disalvo, Daniel / Stonecash, Jeffrey
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2014: 0.377
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.268
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.241
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.198
Volume 14 (2016)
Volume 13 (2015)
Volume 12 (2014)
Volume 11 (2013)
Volume 10 (2012)
Volume 9 (2011)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Even the Geeks are Polarized: The Dispute over the ‘Real Driver’ in American Elections by Goldstein, Ken/ Dallek, Matthew and Rivlin, Joel
- Richer Parties, Better Politics? Party-Centered Campaign Finance Laws and American Democracy by La Raja, Raymond J.
- If I Could Hold a Seminar for Political Journalists… by Fiorina, Morris P.
- Why Trump – and How Far Can He Go? by Mayer, William G.
- Delegation, Control, and the Study of Public Bureaucracy by Moe, Terry M.
Mobilizing Marginalized Groups among Party Elites
1University of Denver, Department of Political Science, 2000 E. Asbury Ave., Denver, CO 80208, USA
2University of Michigan, Organizational Studies Program and Department of Political Science, 722 Dennison Building, 500 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
3Princeton University, Program in Gender and Sexuality Studies and Department of Politics, 303 Robertson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Citation Information: The Forum. Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 257–280, ISSN (Online) 1540-8884, ISSN (Print) 2194-6183, DOI: 10.1515/for-2014-5007, August 2014
- Published Online:
The Democratic Party has long used a system of caucuses and councils to reach out to marginalized groups among convention delegates. This article tests two hypotheses about how this system works within the party. First, the Parties in Service to Candidates Hypothesis holds that caucuses and councils mobilize elites from marginalized groups to increase support for the party nominee. Second, the Group Solidarity Hypothesis holds that caucuses and councils mobilize elites from marginalized groups to enhance group solidarity. Regression analysis of data drawn from an original survey of delegates to the 2008 Democratic National Convention provides no support to the Service Hypothesis, while the evidence supports the Solidarity Hypothesis in the case of the Women’s Caucus, which became a rallying point for women who were disappointed that Hillary Clinton was not the Democratic Party nominee. A similar survey of delegates to the 2008 Republican National Convention did not uncover a parallel system of representing marginalized groups within the Republican Party.