Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2012
ISSN:
1869-6104
DOI:
10.1515/gcc-2012-0005

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 170.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 255.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 204.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 306.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Managing Editor: Rosenberger, Gerhard / Shpilrain, Vladimir

Editorial Board Member: Blackburn, Simon R. / Conder, Marston / Dehornoy, Patrick / Eick, Bettina / Fine, Benjamin / Gilman, Robert / Grigoriev, Dima / Ko, Ki Hyoung / Kreuzer, Martin / May, Alexander / Mikhalev, Alexander V. / Myasnikov, Alexei / Roman'kov, Vitalii / Sapir, Mark / Seress, Akos / Thomas, Rick / Tsaban, Boaz / Capell, Enric Ventura / Weil, Pascal

2 Issues per year

Mathematical Citation Quotient 2011: 0.16

Two-party key establishment: From passive to active security without introducing new assumptions

1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA

Citation Information: Groups - Complexity - Cryptology. Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 1–17, ISSN (Online) 1869-6104, ISSN (Print) 1867-1144, DOI: 10.1515/gcc-2012-0005, May 2012

Publication History:
Received:
2011-06-05
Published Online:
2012-05-01

Abstract.

Key establishment protocols based on hardness assumptions, such as the discrete logarithm problem and the integer factorization problem, are vulnerable to quantum computer attacks, whereas the protocols based on other hardness assumptions, such as the conjugacy search problem and the decomposition search problem, can resist such attacks. The existing protocols based on the hardness assumptions which can resist quantum computer attacks are only passively secure. Compilers are used to convert a passively secure protocol to an actively secure protocol. Compilers involve some tools such as a signature scheme and a collision-resistant hash function. If there are only passively secure protocols but not a signature scheme based on the same assumption, then the application of existing compilers requires the use of such tools based on different assumptions. But the introduction of new tools, based on different assumptions, makes the new actively secure protocol rely on more than one hardness assumption. We offer an approach to derive an actively secure two-party protocol from a passively secure two-party protocol without introducing further hardness assumptions. This serves as a useful formal tool to transform any basic algebraic method of public key cryptography to the real world applicable cryptographic scheme.

Keywords: Key establishment; authentication; one-way function; hash functions

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.