Volume 9 (2009)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Definition of "Investment": Could a Persistent Objector to the Salini Tests be Found in ICSID Arbitral Practice? by Martin, Antoine
- Comparative Personal Property: The Case of Shares by Pretto, Arianna
- Female Circumcision as Female Genital Mutilation: Human Rights or Cultural Imperialism? by Oba, Abdulmumini A
- The E-Commerce Directive and Formation of Contract in a Comparative Perspective by Ramberg, Christina Hultmark
- The International Legal Personality of Multinational Enterprises: Treaty, Custom and the Governance Gap by Hansen, Robin F.
Hard Code Now!
1Hastings College of the Law; Univ. of Turin, Italy, email@example.com
Citation Information: Global Jurist Frontiers. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1535-1653, DOI: 10.2202/1535-1653.1048, February 2002
- Published Online:
This paper advocates the immediate beginning of a genuine, pluralistic political process leading to a binding codification of European Private Law. It is a critique of what I characterize as the post-modernist "soft" discourse of current European private law. This soft ideology stays behind proposals of "restatement" of European law; notions of "model" European codes; assertions of the sufficiency of European legal science as an alternative to codification; theories of competition between national legal systems as an efficient pattern of private law integration; notions of facilitating, optional "default law" as an efficient alternative to mandatory binding legal rules. My claim is that such soft rhetoric is yet another pattern of reception of American legal categories, poorly fitting the present fabric of the European legal scenario, and yielding to a variety of political consequences that should be spelled out rather than kept tacit.The new European Code should be hard, minimal, not limited to contracts, and process-oriented. It should aim to reflect the social fabric of European capitalism. The European codification process should look beyond the frontiers of fortress Europe and locate itself in the global dynamic of lawmaking.