Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
March 2003
ISSN:
1934-2640
DOI:
10.2202/1535-167X.1076

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 168.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 226.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 202.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 272.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Mattei, Ugo / Monti, Alberto

3 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Innovations in Biotechnology - Public Perceptions and Cultural Attitudes. An American's Viewpoint

Drew L. Kershen1

1University of Oklahoma College of Law, dkershen@ou.edu

Citation Information: Global Jurist Topics. Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1535-167X, DOI: 10.2202/1535-167X.1076, March 2003

Publication History:
Published Online:
2003-03-04

Using historical analogies to China and its suppression of the Treasure Fleets of the 15th century and to the adoption of the “Progress of Science” clause of the United States Constitution in 1789, this article explores the cultural attitudes of risk-amplifiers and risk-minimizers about agricultural biotechnology in Europe and the United States. The article explores these attitudes regarding the nature of agricultural biotechnology, the precautionary approach and precautionary principle, and food labels. The article ends by discussing the domestic and international risks that Europe is taking by its political opposition to agricultural biotechnology. More particularly, the article contrasts these European risks with the technological stances toward agricultural biotechnology in the United States, China, and India.

Keywords: agricultural biotechnology; cultural attitudes; economics; technology; risk; Europe; United States; China; India

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.