Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
October 2004
ISSN:
1934-2640
DOI:
10.2202/1535-1661.1131

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 168.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 226.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 202.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 272.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Mattei, Ugo / Monti, Alberto

3 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Antitrust Claims: Why Exclude Them from The Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention ?

Luca G. Radicati di Brozolo1

1Universita’ Cattolica di Milano, luca.radicati@beplex.com

Citation Information: Global Jurist Advances. Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1535-1661, DOI: 10.2202/1535-1661.1131, October 2004

Publication History:
Published Online:
2004-10-06

The exclusion of antitrust claims from the draft of the Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments is unjustified and counterintuitive in the face of the increasing emphasis on private antitrust enforcement. The article examines the issues of forum selection agreements and the forum for actions for damages and the reasons for a reconsideration of the problem by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The analysis takes into account recent developments in the approaches to extraterritorial jurisdiction and of the increased role of party autonomy in conflicts jurisdiction which favors recourse to forum selection and arbitration even in the presence of mandatory rules.

Keywords: Antitrust; private enforcement; jurisdiction; recognition of judgments; forum selection clauses

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.