Volume 15 (2015)
Volume 14 (2014)
Volume 13 (2013)
Volume 9 (2009)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Female Circumcision as Female Genital Mutilation: Human Rights or Cultural Imperialism? by Oba, Abdulmumini A
- Ignoring the Parties' Silence: the Controversial Borders of Implied Terms by Marchetti, Carlo
- Legal Families and Research in Comparative Law by Husa, Jaakko
- Genocide & The Shoah (The Holocaust): Intellectual Tools for Education & Public Policy Decision by Nagan, Winston P. and Haddad, Aitza M.
- Incorporating Cultural Dynamism into International Human Rights Law: A Solution from Anthropology by Goggin, Sean
Promise or Plunder? A Past and Future Look at Law and Development
Citation Information: Global Jurist. Volume 7, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 1934-2640, DOI: 10.2202/1934-2640.1221, August 2007
- Published Online:
Continuities between the law and development movement of the 1960s and current rule of law efforts, some forty years later, indicate that past mistakes might be repeated. Committing to a new course of action first requires examining our original perspective. Normative blindness, false comparisons, legal orientalism, self-serving definitions of what other legal cultures ``lack," imposition versus voluntary receptions of law, and disparities in the developed world create a credibility problem that endangers contemporary efforts.Examples of collisions between state law and non-state law in Zambia, Sardinia, Afghanistan, Iraq, New Guinea, and Paraguay discussed in this article illustrate how the expansion of Euro-American law affects populations in ways that belie ``rule-of-law" rhetoric. Examining the purpose of law, development, and equity projectsi.e., whether they support plunder or redistribution, compensation or punishment, or condone economic development by invasionshould motivate further inquiry into the very premises of western law and its uses in colonialization and globalization. Fuller consideration of the framework within which development efforts operate can lead to more effective policies based on deeds rather than wordsthat is, policies based on the twenty-first rather than the eighteenth century.