Volume 13 (2013)
Volume 9 (2009)
Most Downloaded Articles
- What is Missing? (Female Genital Surgeries - Infibulation, Excision, Clitoridectomy - in Eritrea) by Favali, Lyda
- Incorporating Cultural Dynamism into International Human Rights Law: A Solution from Anthropology by Goggin, Sean
- Cultural Relativism the American Way: The Nationalist School of International Law in the United States by Lorite Escorihuela, Alejandro
- Genocide & The Shoah (The Holocaust): Intellectual Tools for Education & Public Policy Decision by Nagan, Winston P. and Haddad, Aitza M.
- Female Circumcision as Female Genital Mutilation: Human Rights or Cultural Imperialism? by Oba, Abdulmumini A
Islamic State and the Common Law in Malaysia: A Case Study of Lina Joy
1Australian National University, (email)
Citation Information: Global Jurist. Volume 8, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 1934-2640, DOI: 10.2202/1934-2640.1269, June 2008
- Published Online:
``Every person has the right to profess and practise his religion." Article 11 of the Malaysian Constitution could hardly be more explicit. However, Lina Joy was told by the Federal Court that she could not exercise her constitutional right without prior approval by the syariah court. The case of Lina Joy has important consequences for Malaysia's political and constitutional development especially if viewed within the context of Malaysia's increasing Islamization. In this case, syariah law moved beyond the confines of the syariah court to influence the legal outcome of a common law adjudication in the civil court. An analysis of the majority and minority judgments in Lina Joy reveals two conceptions and usages of the common law in the face of Islamization: it can either be a Trojan horse to import syariah law principles into the legal system, or a tool of resistance against the Islamization of the Malaysian legal system.