Etracker Debug:
	et_pagename = "Global Jurist|gj|C|[EN]"
	
        
Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Global Jurist

Ed. by Mattei, Ugo / Monti, Alberto

3 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Cynicism and Guilt in International Law after Rwanda

1Department of International Politics, City University London, London, UK

Citation Information: Global Jurist. Volume 13, Issue 2-3, Pages 71–85, ISSN (Online) 1934-2640, ISSN (Print) 2194-5675, DOI: 10.1515/gj-2014-0004, May 2014

Publication History

Published Online:
2014-05-14

Abstract

Framing the Rwandan genocide as a “failure” of international law forces one to approach it as an unintended consequence of an otherwise benign system of formal relations between states. The present article looks at it instead as a physiological product of international law, disclosing the possibility to contemplate the latter as a fundamentally imperialistic system pegged on the controversial notion of “rule of law”. International law embodies a system of legalised extraction swaying between cynicism and guilt: despite its real face showing on occasions like Rwanda, it keeps revamping itself so as to prevent a fundamental appraisal of the contradictory nature of the system as a whole.

Keywords: Rwanda; genocide; international law

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.