Cynicism and Guilt in International Law after Rwanda : Global Jurist

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Global Jurist

Ed. by Mattei, Ugo / Monti, Alberto


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.101

VolumeIssuePage

Cynicism and Guilt in International Law after Rwanda

1Department of International Politics, City University London, London, UK

Citation Information: Global Jurist. Volume 13, Issue 2-3, Pages 71–85, ISSN (Online) 1934-2640, ISSN (Print) 2194-5675, DOI: 10.1515/gj-2014-0004, May 2014

Publication History

Published Online:
2014-05-14

Abstract

Framing the Rwandan genocide as a “failure” of international law forces one to approach it as an unintended consequence of an otherwise benign system of formal relations between states. The present article looks at it instead as a physiological product of international law, disclosing the possibility to contemplate the latter as a fundamentally imperialistic system pegged on the controversial notion of “rule of law”. International law embodies a system of legalised extraction swaying between cynicism and guilt: despite its real face showing on occasions like Rwanda, it keeps revamping itself so as to prevent a fundamental appraisal of the contradictory nature of the system as a whole.

Keywords: Rwanda; genocide; international law

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.