Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Human Movement

The Journal of University School of Physical Education, Wroclaw; University School of Physical Education, Krakow

4 Issues per year

Open Access
VolumeIssuePage

Open Access

Participation of Youth in Physical Education from the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory

Krzysztof Sas-Nowosielski1

Chair of Humanistic Bases of Physical Culture, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland1

This content is open access.
(CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Citation Information: Human Movement. Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 134–141, ISSN (Online) 1899-1955, ISSN (Print) 1732-3991, DOI: 10.2478/v10038-008-0019-2, January 2009

Publication History:
Published Online:
2009-01-16

Participation of Youth in Physical Education from the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory

Purpose. The purpose of the study was to determine whether perceived competence, autonomy and relatedness are correlated with behavioral regulations proposed in the self-determination theory; and to examine effects of these regulations on the intention to fully participate in physical education lessons and on experiencing boredom during them. Basic procedures. The study used a crosssectional analysis. A total of 293 middle- and high-school students took part in the experiment. Participation in the study was anonymous and voluntary. The data was analyzed using structural equation modeling (path analysis). Main findings. Out of the theorized psychological mediators of behavioral regulations only perceived competence and relatedness turned out to be statistically significant. Perceived competence was the strongest predictor of both intrinsic motivation (positive) and amotivation (negative). As a consequence of behavioral regulations, intention to participate was positively predicted by intrinsic motivation and negatively by amotivation, whereas boredom was negatively predicted by intrinsic motivation and positively by amotivation. Conclusions. To support students' intentions to fully participate in physical education classes and to reduce boredom experienced during them PE teachers should promote students' intrinsic motivation to participate in physical education. This can be possible when perceived physical competence in the PE context is supported and positive interpersonal relationships between students are promoted.

Keywords: physical education; motivation

  • Sjöström, M., Oja, P., Hagströmer, M., Smith, B. J., Bauman, A., Health-enhancing physical activity across European Union countries: the Eurobarometer study. J Public Health, 2006, 14(5), 291-300. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-006-0031-y.[CrossRef]

  • Cabak, A., Woynarowska, B., Physical activity of adolescents aged 11-15 in Poland and other countries in 2002 [in Polish]. Wych Fiz Sport, 2004, 48, 355-360.

  • Woynarowska, B., Health promotion, health education and physical culture in school. In: The VIth Congress of Physical Culture in School [in Polish]. MENiS, Warszawa 2004, 13-23.

  • Dobosz, J., Trzcińska, D., Who and why does not participate in PE lessons? [in Polish]. Wych Fiz Zdrow, 2000, 2-3, 81-85.

  • Bukowiec, M., Postulated, assumed and real functions of physical education in preparation to participation in physical culture. AWF, Kraków 1990.

  • Osiński, W., The conception of "health-related fitness" as a theoretical framework in contemporary physical education. In: Muszkieta R., Bronikowski M. (eds.), Physical education in the new educational system [in Polish]. AWF, Poznań 2000, 47-55.

  • Carlson, T. B., We hate gym: Student alienation from physical education. J Teaching PE, 1995, 14, 467-477.

  • Mohr, D. J., Townsend, J. S., Pritchard, T., Rethinking middle school physical education: combining lifetime leisure activities and sport education to encourage physical activity. Physical Educator, 2006, 63, 18-29.

  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educational Psychol, 2000, 25(1), 54-67. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.[CrossRef]

  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inquiry, 2000, 11(4), 227-268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.[CrossRef]

  • Biddle, S. J. H., Mutrie, N., Psychology of physical activity. Determinants, well-being and interventions. Routledge, London—New York 2001.

  • Bryan, C. L., Solmon, M., Self-determination in Physical Education: Designing class environments to promote active lifestyles. J Teaching PE, 2007, 26(3), 260-278.

  • Kilpatrick, M., Hebert, E., Jacobsen, D., Physical activity motivation. A practitioner's guide to self-determination theory. JOPERD, 2002, 73(4), 36-41.

  • Standage, M., Gillison, F., Treasure, D. C., Self-determination and motivation in physical education. In: Hagger M. S., Chatzisarantis N. L. D. (eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign 2007, 71-85.

  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., The trans-contextual model of motivation. In: Hagger M. S., Chatzisarantis N. L. D. (eds.), Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign 2007, 54-70.

  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Barkoukis, V., Wang, C. K. J., Baranowski, J., Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. J Educ Psychol, 2001, 97(3), 376-390.

  • Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., The influence of self-determination in physical education on leisure-time physical activity behavior. Res Quart Exerc Sport, 2007, 78(4), 328-338.

  • Ntoumanis, N., A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. Br J Educ Psychol, 2001, 71, 225-242.[PubMed] [CrossRef]

  • Standage, M., Duda, J. L., Ntoumanis, N., A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from selfdetermination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. J Educ Psychol, 2003, 95(1), 97-110.[CrossRef]

  • Standage, M., Duda, J. L., Ntoumanis, N., A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. Br J Educ Psychol, 2005, 75, 411-433.[CrossRef] [PubMed]

  • Ntoumanis, N., A prospective study of participation in optional school physical education using a self-determination theory framework. J Educ Psychol, 2005, 97(3), 444-453.[CrossRef]

  • Sas-Nowosielski, K., Education to physical activity [In Polish]. AWF, Katowice 2003.

  • Standage, M., Duda, J. L., Ntoumanis, N., Predicting motivational regulations in physical education: the interplay between dispositional goal orientations, motivational climate and perceived competence. J Sports Sci, 2003, 21(8), 631-647. DOI: 10.1080/0264041031000101962.[CrossRef]

  • Prusak, K. A., Treasure, D. C., Darst, P. W., Pangrazi, R. P., The effects of choice on motivation of adolescent girls in physical education. J Teaching PE, 2004, 23, 19-29.

  • Sokołowski A, Sagan, A., Analysis of data in marketing and public opinion research. In: Examples of statistical inference with the use of Statistica. [in Polish]. Statsoft, Warszawa 1999, 8-12.

  • Brophy, J., Motivating students to learn [in Polish]. PWN, Warszawa 2002.

  • Nicholls, J. G., The competitive ethos and democratic education. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1989.

  • Biddle, S. J. H., Enhancing motivation in physical education. In: Roberts G. C. (ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign 2001, 101-127.

  • Cwalina, W., Using structural equation modeling in social sciences [in Polish]. Statsoft 2000. Available from URL: http://www.statsoft.pl/czytelnia/badanianaukowe/d4spol/nazastosowaniemod3.pdf

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.