The review seeks to emphasize that the foundational principles of criminal evidence are on the one hand rectitudinal (epistemological) and on the other hand moral, and to comment that, whilst the authors have a tendency to lean towards the moral at the expense of the epistemological, the strength of the work is its positive (in contrast to normative) approach in isolating the fundamental principles which underlie the approach of English courts to matters evidential.
Ed. by Callen, Craig R. / Jackson, John D. / Risinger, D. Michael / Dwyer, Deirdre / Pardo, Michael S. / Doran, Sean
1 Issue per year
Issues
Volume 8 (2010)
Volume 7 (2009)
Volume 5 (2007)
Volume 4 (2006)
Volume 3 (2005)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Comparative Observations on the Burden of Proof for Criminal Defences by Ho, Hock Lai
- Scientific Evidence in Europe -- Admissibility, Evaluation and Equality of Arms by Champod, Christophe and Vuille, Joëlle
- The Narrative Fallacy by Menashe, Doron and Shamash, Mutal E
- From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States by Vasiliev, Sergey V.
- The Fourth Amendment's Exclusionary Rule: Blurring the Line Between Rule and Exception by Heffernan, Liz
Review of Roberts and Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence
Andrew Ligertwood
1University of Adelaide
Citation Information: International Commentary on Evidence. Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1554-4567, DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1028, May 2005
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2005-05-01
Comments (0)