In this book, Erica Beecher-Monas develops an interdisciplinary approach, combining legal and cross-disciplinary scientific considerations, to provide a heuristic framework within which to assess whether expert evidence meets the requirements of intellectual due process. It provides a valuable introduction for lawyers to the methodological issues that need to be addressed in understanding whether a piece of proposed expert evidence can be classified as 'scientific.' This book marks a welcome re-assertion, on firm epistemological grounds, that the use of expert evidence represents part of the rationalist endeavor of accurate fact determination, in support of the moral authority of law.

Ed. by Callen, Craig R. / Jackson, John D. / Risinger, D. Michael / Dwyer, Deirdre / Pardo, Michael S. / Doran, Sean
1 Issue per year
Issues
Volume 8 (2010)
Volume 7 (2009)
Volume 5 (2007)
Volume 4 (2006)
Volume 3 (2005)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Comparative Observations on the Burden of Proof for Criminal Defences by Ho, Hock Lai
- Scientific Evidence in Europe -- Admissibility, Evaluation and Equality of Arms by Champod, Christophe and Vuille, Joëlle
- The Narrative Fallacy by Menashe, Doron and Shamash, Mutal E
- From Liberal Extremity to Safe Mainstream? The Comparative Controversies of Witness Preparation in the United States by Vasiliev, Sergey V.
- The Fourth Amendment's Exclusionary Rule: Blurring the Line Between Rule and Exception by Heffernan, Liz
Book Review of Erica Beecher-Monas, Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process
Deirdre Dwyer
1Pembroke College, Oxford
Citation Information: International Commentary on Evidence. Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1554-4567, DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1074, April 2008
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2008-04-07
Keywords: expert evidence; judicial fact-finding


















Comments (0)