Abstract
Introduction: Tobacco use, which begins in adolescence and childhood and continues in later life, is the major avoidable risk for non-communicable diseases and death in the world. Self-reports have frequently been used to estimate smoking prevalence and health consequences. This study explores the validity of self-reports of smoking behavior among schoolchildren in Tunisia.
Materials and methods: This study was conducted in March 2014 among a sample of 147 schoolchildren randomly selected. Data concerning the smoking habit were collected by a questionnaire designed for the purposes of this work. Then, exhaled CO, a biochemical marker of smoke exposure, was measured using piCO+ Smokerlyzer® breath CO monitor among participants. Sensitivity and specificity of self-reports were calculated.
Results: The prevalence of reported smoking was 9.5% with 16.7% and 1.7% respectively among boys and girls. Their mean age was 14.5±1.28 years old. When considering 4 ppm as the cut-off level of breath CO, sensitivity and specificity of self-reports were 100% and 93.7%, respectively. But at a breath CO cut-off of 3 ppm, self-reporting was 62.5% sensitive and 93.5% specific.
Conclusion: According to our findings, we suggest that self-reports can be considered as a good tool to be used with a reasonable confidence to assess the smoking status.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by award n° R56TW009265 from the Fogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health.
References
1. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011. Warning about the dangers of tobacco. [Cited 2015 Jan 8] Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240687813_eng.pdf?ua=1.Search in Google Scholar
2. Gore FM, Bloem PJ, Patton GC, Ferguson J, Joseph V, et al. Global burden of disease in young people aged 10–24 years: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2011;377:2093–102.10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60512-6Search in Google Scholar
3. Connor Gorber S, Schofield-Hurwitz S, Hardt J, Levasseur G, Tremblay M. The accuracy of self-reported smoking: a systematic review of the relationship between self-reported and cotinine-assessed smoking status. Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11:12–24.10.1093/ntr/ntn010Search in Google Scholar
4. Patton GC, Coffey C, Cappa C, Currie D, Riley L, et al. Health of the world’s adolescents: a synthesis of internationally comparable data. Lancet 2012:379:1665–75.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60203-7Search in Google Scholar
5. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, et al. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 1994:84:1086–93.10.2105/AJPH.84.7.1086Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Health 1987;77:1435–8.10.2105/AJPH.77.11.1435Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
7. Fendrich M, Mackesy-Amiti ME, Johnson TP, Hubbell A, Wislar JS. Tobacco-reporting validity in an epidemiological drug-use survey. Addict Behav 2005;30:175–81.10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.04.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Sillett RW, Wilson MB, Malcolm RE, Ball KP. Deception among smokers. Br Med J 1978;2:1185–6.10.1136/bmj.2.6146.1185Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Stein LAR, Colby SM, O’Leary TA, Monti PM, Rohsenow DJ, et al. Response distortion in adolescents who smoke: a pilot study. J Drug Educ 2002;32:271–86.10.2190/GL7E-B8MV-P9NH-KCVVSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Deveci SE, Deveci F, Açik Y, Ozan AT. The measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide in healthy smokers and non-smokers. Respir Med 2004;98:551–6.10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Sandberg A, Sköld CM, Grunewald J, Eklund A, Wheelock ÅM. Assessing recent smoking status by measuring exhaled carbon monoxide levels. PLoS One 2011;6:e28864.10.1371/journal.pone.0028864Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Jarvis MJ, Russell MAH, Saloojee Y. Expired air carbon monoxide: a simple breath test of tobacco smoke intake. Br Med J 1980;281:484–5.10.1136/bmj.281.6238.484Search in Google Scholar
13. Murray RP, Connett JE, Lauger GG, Voelker HT. Error in smoking measures: effects of intervention on relations of cotinine and carbon monoxide to self-reported smoking. Am J Public Health 1993;83:1251–7.10.2105/AJPH.83.9.1251Search in Google Scholar
14. Rebagliato M. Validation of self-reported smoking. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002;56:163–4.10.1136/jech.56.3.163Search in Google Scholar
15. Underner M, Peiffer G. Interpretation of exhaled CO levels in studies on smoking. Rev Mal Respir 2010;27:293–300.10.1016/j.rmr.2009.09.004Search in Google Scholar
16. Frederiksen LW, Martin JE. Carbon monoxide and smoking behavior. Addict Behav 1979;4:21–30.10.1016/0306-4603(79)90017-0Search in Google Scholar
17. Vogt TM, Selvin S, Widdowson G, Hulley SB. Expired air carbon monoxide and serum thiocyanate as objective measures of cigarette exposure. Am J Public Health 1977;67:545–9.10.2105/AJPH.67.6.545Search in Google Scholar
18. Ruth KJ, Neaton JD. Evaluation of two biological markers of tobacco exposure. MRFIT Research Group. Prev Med 1991;20:574–89.10.1016/0091-7435(91)90056-ASearch in Google Scholar
19. Cropsey KL, Eldridge GD, Weaver MF, Villalobos GC, Stitzer ML. Expired carbon monoxide levels in self-reported smokers and nonsmokers in prison. Nicotine Tob Res 2006;8:653–9.10.1080/14622200600789684Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Javors MA, Hatch JP, Lamb RJ. Cut-off levels for breath carbon monoxide as a marker for cigarette smoking. Addiction 2005;100:59–167.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00957.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Vançelik S, Beyhun NE, Acemoglu H. Interactions between exhaled CO, smoking status and nicotine dependency in a sample of Turkish adolescents. Turk J Pediatr 2009;51:56–64.Search in Google Scholar
22. Groman E, Riemerth A, Bernhard G, Appeltauer G, Schuster B, et al. Can carbon monoxide analysers be fuelled by alcohol intake? Tob Control 2006;15:143.10.1136/tc.2006.015925Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
23. Lagrue G, Diviné C, Dalle M, Cormier S, Maurel A. Intérêt de la mesure du CO dans l’air expiré dans les maladies vasculaires. Sang ThromboseVaiss 2004;16:389–91.Search in Google Scholar
24. Low ECT, Ong MCC, Tan M. Breath carbonmonoxide as an indication of smoking habit in the military setting. Singapore Med J 2004;45:578–82.Search in Google Scholar
25. Usmani ZC, Craig P, Shipton D, Tappin D. Comparison of CO breath testing and women’s self-reporting of smoking behaviour for identifying smoking during pregnancy. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2008;3:4.10.1186/1747-597X-3-4Search in Google Scholar
26. Aggarwal P, Varshney S, Kandpal SD, Gupta D. Tobacco smoking status as assessed by oral questionnaire results 30% under-reporting by adult males in reural India: a confirmatory comparison by xhaled breath carbon monoxide analysis. J Family Med Prim Care 2014;3:199–203.10.4103/2249-4863.141606Search in Google Scholar
27. Parker DR, Lasater TM, Windsor R, Wilkins J, Upegui DI, et al. The accuracy of self-reported smoking status assessed by cotinine test strips. Nicotine Tob Res 2002;4:305–9.10.1080/14622200210142715Search in Google Scholar
28. Luepker RV, Pechacek TF, Murray DM, Johnson CA, Hund F, et al. Saliva thiocyanate: a chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. Am J Public Health 1981;71:1320–4.10.2105/AJPH.71.12.1320Search in Google Scholar
29. Post A, Gilljam H, Rosendahl I, Meurling L, Bremberg S, et al. Validity of self reports in a cohort of Swedish adolescent smokers and smokeless tobacco (snus) users. Tob Control 2005;14:114–7.10.1136/tc.2004.008789Search in Google Scholar
30. Dolcini MM, Adler NE, Lee P, Bauman KE. An assessment of the validity of adolescent self-reported smoking using three biological indicators. Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5: 473–83.10.1080/1462220031000118586Search in Google Scholar
31. Wong SL, Shields M, Leatherdale S, Malaison E, Hammond D. Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status. Health Rep 2012;23:47–53.Search in Google Scholar
32. Studts JL, Ghate SR, Gill JL, Studts CR, Barnes CN, et al. Validity of self-reported smoking status among participants in a lung cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1825–8.10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0393Search in Google Scholar
33. Bauman KE, Ennett SE. Tobacco use by black and white adolescents: the validity of self-reports. Am J Public Health 1994;84:394–8.10.2105/AJPH.84.3.394Search in Google Scholar
34. Brener ND, Billy JDG, Grady WR. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health 2003;33:436–57.10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00052-1Search in Google Scholar
35. Biglan A, Ary DV. Methodological issues in research on smoking prevention. NIDA Res Monogr 1985;63:170–95.10.1037/e472042004-001Search in Google Scholar
36. Brittingham A, Tourangeau R, Kay W. Reports of smoking in a national survey: data from screening and detailed interviews, and from self- and interviewer-administered questions. Ann Epidemiol 1998;8:393–401.10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00237-8Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter