Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
July 2011
ISSN:
1557-4679
DOI:
10.2202/1557-4679.1329

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 285.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 384.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 342.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 461.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Hubbard, Alan E. / van der Laan, Mark J.

1 Issue per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 1.284

Principal Stratification -- Uses and Limitations

Tyler J VanderWeele

1Harvard University

Citation Information: The International Journal of Biostatistics. Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1–14, ISSN (Online) 1557-4679, DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1329, July 2011

Publication History:
Published Online:
2011-07-11

Pearl (2011) asked for the causal inference community to clarify the role of the principal stratification framework in the analysis of causal effects. Here, I argue that the notion of principal stratification has shed light on problems of non-compliance, censoring-by-death, and the analysis of post-infection outcomes; that it may be of use in considering problems of surrogacy but further development is needed; that it is of some use in assessing “direct effects”; but that it is not the appropriate tool for assessing “mediation.” There is nothing within the principal stratification framework that corresponds to a measure of an “indirect” or “mediated” effect.

Keywords: causal inference; mediation; non-compliance; potential outcomes; principal stratification; surrogates

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.