Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

The International Journal of Biostatistics

Ed. by Hubbard, Alan E. / van der Laan, Mark J.

2 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 0.948
Mathematical Citation Quotient 2012: 0.10

Free Access

Double-Robust Estimators: Slightly More Bayesian than Meets the Eye?

Paul Gustafson1

1University of British Columbia

Citation Information: The International Journal of Biostatistics. Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 1–15, ISSN (Online) 1557-4679, DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1349, January 2012

Publication History

Published Online:
2012-01-06

Consider the simple setting of point exposure, outcome and confounding variables, all of which are discrete. As is well known, parametric modeling of outcome given exposure and confounders and also exposure given confounders can yield a double-robust estimator. This has the property of being consistent as long as at least one of the two specified models is correct. Such an estimator can also be cast as arising from a compromise between the parametric outcome model and a nonparametric or saturated outcome model. This brings to mind an alternate compromise based on Bayesian model averaging, and prompts comparisons between the double-robust method and the Bayesian method.

Keywords: Bayesian model averaging; causal inference; double-robust; observational data

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.