New Journal at De Gruyter!
International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering
Ed. by de Lasa, Hugo / Xu, Charles Chunbao
4 Issues per year
IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2014: 0.592
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.678
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.257
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.358
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.484
Volume 13 (2015)
Volume 12 (2014)
Volume 11 (2013)
Volume 10 (2012)
Volume 9 (2011)
Volume 8 (2010)
Volume 7 (2009)
Volume 6 (2008)
Volume 5 (2007)
Volume 4 (2006)
Volume 3 (2005)
Volume 2 (2004)
Volume 1 (2002)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Design and Optimization of a Fixed Bed Reactor for Direct Dimethyl Ether Production from Syngas Using Differential Evolution Algorithm by Vakili, Reza and Eslamloueyan, Reza
- Bubble Columns with Internals: A Review by Youssef, Ahmed A./ Al-Dahhan, Muthanna H. and Dudukovic, Milorad P.
- Conversion of Glycerol into Value-Added Products Over Cu–Ni Catalyst Supported on γ-Al2O3 and Activated Carbon by Pudi, Satyanarayana Murty/ Mondal, Tarak/ Biswas, Prakash/ Biswas, Shalini and Sinha, Shishir
Phase Mixing Modeling in Multiphase Reactors Containing Gas Bubble: a Review.
1Ecole polytechnique de Montreal, (email)
2Ecole Polytechnique Montreal, (email)
3Ecole Polytechnique, (email)
Citation Information: International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering. Volume 2, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1542-6580, DOI: 10.2202/1542-6580.1106, May 2004
- Published Online:
Multiphase reactors are often used as petrochemical, biological and pharmaceutical reactors. Understanding the mixing mechanism responsible for phase mixing is necessary for modeling purposes. Phase mixing may considerably affect reactor performance. In the literature, each phase mixing was often described by the Axial Dispersion Model (ADM), without physical justification. Some authors doubted the validity of the ADM and that it could represent the mixing of the phases and instead proposed other models. Also, some authors studied the fundamental mechanism responsible for phase mixing. For conversion and selectivity prediction purposes, the use of more complex phenomenological phase mixing models is essential when the kinetics are rapid and the interfacial mass transfer is limited. Many literature reviews concerning multiphase reactors have been published. These reviews, however, discuss phase mixing modeling based on the ADM and do not deal with the other phase mixing models. The aim of this work is to review the literature on phase mixing modeling, based on a mechanistic approach, for three kinds of multiphase reactors: the bubble column (solid free), slurry bubble column (small/light particles) and three phase fluidized bed (large/heavy particles) reactors. The common feature of these reactors is the presence of gas bubbles, which considerably influence the phase hydrodynamic. Hence, a mixing model proposed for one of these reactors may be conceptually representative of the mixing of the two others.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.