Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
May 2005
ISSN:
1548-923X
DOI:
10.2202/1548-923X.1081

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 137.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 184.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 165.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 221.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Andrusyszyn, Mary-Anne / Cragg, Catherine Elizabeth / Goldenberg, Dolly / Iwasiw, Carroll Louise / Maltby, Hendrika J.

1 Issue per year

Validation of the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision Scale

Mikko Saarikoski1 / Hannu Isoaho2 / Helena Leino-Kilpi3 / Tony Warne4

1Turku Polytechnic, Finland, mikko.saarikoski@turkuamk.fi

2University of Turku, hisoaho@yahoo.com

3University of Turku, heleiki@utu.fi

4Manchester Metropolitan University, A.R.Warne@mmu.ac.uk

Citation Information: International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1548-923X, DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1081, May 2005

Publication History:
Published Online:
2005-05-27

The aim of the study was to validate a new research instrument to evaluate the quality of the clinical learning environment and the supervision given to nursing students by qualified staff nurses. This paper describes the validation process of the research instrument. Dunn's and Burnett's (1995) CLE scale was chosen for the concurrent research instrument to test validity. The theoretical framework of this study draws on empirical research into clinical learning environments and supervision undertaken during the 1980's and 1990's. The sample consisted of nursing students who had undertaken a clinical placement in a hospital setting. The data (n=416) were collected from four Nursing Colleges in Finland. Students evaluated their clinical placements as being 'good' in both instruments. The supervisory relationship was the most important factor in students' supervisory system but this requires a positive atmosphere and a 'good' leadership in order to be effective. The congruence between the instruments in use was high so that it is impossible to note the possible impact of cultural differences in this instrument validation process.

Keywords: clinical learning environment; supervisory relationship; instrument validation; concurrent validity

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.