Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
February 2007
ISSN:
1548-923X
DOI:
10.2202/1548-923X.1307

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 137.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 184.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 165.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 221.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Ed. by Andrusyszyn, Mary-Anne / Cragg, Catherine Elizabeth / Goldenberg, Dolly / Iwasiw, Carroll Louise / Maltby, Hendrika J.

1 Issue per year

Measuring Clinical Practice Parameters with Human Patient Simulation: A Pilot Study

Kavita Radhakrishnan1 / Joan P Roche2 / Helene Cunningham3

1University of Massachusetts, Amherst, kavitar6@gmail.com

2University of Massachusetts, Amherst, jproche@nursing.umass.edu

3University of Massachusetts, Amherst, helene@nursing.umass.edu

Citation Information: International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1548-923X, DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1307, February 2007

Publication History:
Published Online:
2007-02-21

Human Patient Simulators (HPS), electronically controlled mannequins as patient models, are increasingly being used in nursing education. However, no studies have validated the influence of systematic practice with HPS on clinical performance of nursing students. This pilot study attempted to identify the nursing clinical practice parameters influenced by HPS by evaluating the clinical performance of 12 senior second degree BSN students in five categories: safety, basic assessment skills, prioritization, problem-focused assessment, ensuing interventions, delegation and communication in a complex two-patient, simulated assignment. Students who practiced with the HPS in addition to their usual clinical training had significantly higher scores than the control group (usual clinical training alone) on Patient Identification (a subcategory of the safety category; p = 0.001), and on Assessing Vital Signs (a subcategory of the basic assessment category; p = 0.009). The control and intervention groups' performances were similar in every other category. Replication of this pilot with a larger sample is recommended.

Keywords: human simulator; evaluation tool; undergraduate nurse education; 2-patient simulation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.