Ed. by Andrusyszyn, Mary-Anne / Cragg, Catherine Elizabeth / Goldenberg, Dolly / Iwasiw, Carroll Louise / Maltby, Hendrika J.
1 Issue per year
Volume 10 (2013)
Volume 9 (2012)
Volume 8 (2011)
Volume 7 (2010)
Volume 6 (2009)
Volume 4 (2007)
Volume 3 (2006)
Volume 2 (2005)
Volume 1 (2004)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Successful Transition of the New Graduate Nurse by Romyn, Donna M/ Linton, Noreen/ Giblin, Cathy/ Hendrickson, Brenda/ Houger Limacher, Lori/ Murray, Carol/ Nordstrom, Pamela/ Thauberger, Gail/ Vosburgh, Di/ Vye-Rogers, Leianne/ Weidner, Arlene and Zimmel, Colleen M
- Curriculum Reform in Baccalaureate Nursing Education: Review of the Literature by Forbes, Maryann O and Hickey, Mary T
- Educating the Future eHealth Professional Nurse by Booth, Richard G
- Educating Leaders in Nursing: Faculty Perspectives by Kalb, Kathleen A./ O'Conner-Von, Susan K./ Schipper, Lindsay M./ Watkins, Alison K. and Yetter, Dawn M.
- Self-Efficacy and Resilience in Baccalaureate Nursing Students by Taylor, Heidi and Reyes, Helen
Measuring Clinical Practice Parameters with Human Patient Simulation: A Pilot Study
1University of Massachusetts, Amherst, firstname.lastname@example.org
2University of Massachusetts, Amherst, email@example.com
3University of Massachusetts, Amherst, firstname.lastname@example.org
Citation Information: International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1548-923X, DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1307, February 2007
- Published Online:
Human Patient Simulators (HPS), electronically controlled mannequins as patient models, are increasingly being used in nursing education. However, no studies have validated the influence of systematic practice with HPS on clinical performance of nursing students. This pilot study attempted to identify the nursing clinical practice parameters influenced by HPS by evaluating the clinical performance of 12 senior second degree BSN students in five categories: safety, basic assessment skills, prioritization, problem-focused assessment, ensuing interventions, delegation and communication in a complex two-patient, simulated assignment. Students who practiced with the HPS in addition to their usual clinical training had significantly higher scores than the control group (usual clinical training alone) on Patient Identification (a subcategory of the safety category; p = 0.001), and on Assessing Vital Signs (a subcategory of the basic assessment category; p = 0.009). The control and intervention groups' performances were similar in every other category. Replication of this pilot with a larger sample is recommended.