Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

49,00 € / $74.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
February 2011
ISSN:
1612-9768
DOI:
10.1515/ijpt.2011.016

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 49.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 74.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 145.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 218.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 174.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 262.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

European Science Foundation ranking A

Ed. by Graham, Elaine / Schröder, Bernd

In cooperation with Dreyer, Jaco / Forrester, Duncan / Gräb, Wilhelm / Grethlein, Christian / Junker-Kenny, Maureen / Mette, Norbert / Miller-McLemore, Bonnie / Mullino Moore, Mary Elizabeth / Nieman, James / Osmer, Richard / Schreiter, Robert / Schweitzer, Friedrich / Kwan Un, Joon / Ven, Johannes

2 Issues per year

VolumeIssuePage

Power, justice, asymmetry and relationality in pastoral care and parent–child relationships

1K. U. Leuven, Faculteit Godgeleerdheid, St. Michielsstraat 6, BE-3000 Leuven, www.theo.kuleuven.be

Citation Information: International Journal of Practical Theology. Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 204–218, ISSN (Online) 1612-9768, ISSN (Print) 1430-6921, DOI: 10.1515/ijpt.2011.016, February 2011

Publication History:
Published Online:
2011-02-24

Abstract

This contribution develops a practical theological reflection on power in relations of ‘pastoral care’. In a first step, different critiques on ‘power’ in pastoral care are analyzed. The author argues that the influence of ‘power’ has to be taken seriously in pastoral relationships. In a second step, a reflection on care for children functions as a starting point for thinking about power, asymmetry and mutuality in pastoral relations. Thereby, the reflection about ‘asymmetry’ in the theories of Emmanuel Levinas and Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy is considered as fruitful not only in parent-child relations, but also in relations of pastoral care. Reflection on pastoral care should also include thinking in terms of ‘justice’. In a third step, the author argues that a relational anthropology is the basis for an adequate thinking on power, asymmetry and mutuality in pastoral relations. In a fourth step, the author asks how we can avoid thinking about pastoral relationships in an excessively individualistic way, and how we can avoid the individualistic tendency that the parent-child relationship inspires when reflecting on pastoral relationships? She argues that solidarity is a very important aspect in thinking about asymmetrical relationships. Nevertheless, it does not remove the burden to reflect permanently about goals and aims in relationships, about justice and about power balances.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.