Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Intercultural Pragmatics

Editor-in-Chief: Kecskes, Istvan

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2013: 1.062
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.223
Rank 37 out of 169 in category Linguistics in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 1.071
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.168

ERIH category 2011: INT2

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics

Citation Information: Intercultural Pragmatics. Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 177–196, ISSN (Online) 1613-365X, ISSN (Print) 1612-295X, DOI: 10.1515/iprg.2011.009, May 2011

Publication History

Published Online:
2011-05-02

Abstract

Both cognitive linguists and relevance theorists are developing original approaches to metaphor. Both shed new light on old debates and suggest fruitful directions for research. Although there has so far been little interaction between the two approaches, Raymond Gibbs and Markus Tendahl (Mind & Language 21: 379–403, 2006, Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1823–1864, 2008) have recently begun to compare them and consider how they might be combined. This paper is intended as a contribution to that debate. After outlining some parallels and differences between the two approaches, I will discuss how they might fit together to give a fuller picture of the role of metaphor in language and thought.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.