Volume 11 (2013)
Volume 10 (2012)
Volume 9 (2011)
Volume 8 (2010)
Volume 4 (2006)
Volume 1 (2003)
Most Downloaded Articles
- The Cooperative Yardstick Revisited: Panel Evidence from the European Dairy Sectors by Hanisch, Markus/ Rommel, Jens and Müller, Malte
- Cartels and Rent Sharing at the Farmer–Trader Interface: Evidence from Ghana’s Tomato Sector by Ngeleza, Guyslain K. and Robinson, Elizabeth J.Z.
- Buyer Power in U.K. Food Retailing: A 'First-Pass' Test by Lloyd, Tim/ McCorriston, Steve/ Morgan, Wyn/ Rayner, Anthony and Weldegebriel, Habtu
- The Pro-Competitive Effect of Coffee Cooperatives in Chiapas, Mexico by Milford, Anna B.
- U.S. Brewing Industry Profitability: A Simultaneous Determination of Structure, Conduct, and Performance by Bhuyan, Sanjib and McCafferty, Michael
Tax Incidence When Quality Matters: Evidence from the Beer Market
1University of Massachusetts Amherst University of British Columbia
2University of Massachusetts Amherst University of British Columbia
Citation Information: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization. Volume 9, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 1542-0485, DOI: 10.2202/1542-0485.1353, December 2011
- Published Online:
What are the effects of a per-unit tax on the sales of a good? The answer in standard economics textbooks is a reduction in quantity and an increase in price. However, the homogeneous-product assumption in such treatments is not always correct because the taxed product is frequently sold under numerous differentiated brands. In general, quantity and price adjustments to a per-unit tax increase may vary differentially by brand, which implies that tax incidence requires a more thorough analysis than the standard one. In this paper, we test a popular theoretical prediction that the effects of a per-unit tax on sales may be different for low-quality brands than for high-quality brands. We exploit two exogenous variations on per-unit charges (excise taxes and shipping costs) in the beer industry to study if quality is an important determinant of equilibrium quantity, prices and advertising expenditures. We find that, when faced with higher per-unit charges, the equilibrium price and quantity of a brand are usually positively associated with its quality level; similarly, higher per-unit charges appear to provide firms with an incentive to shift advertising effort towards brands of higher quality. We discuss implications for public policy and firm profitability.