Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
January 2012
ISSN:
2152-2812
DOI:
10.1515/2152-2812.1102

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 312.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 420.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 375.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 504.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Institutional Safeguards for Cost Benefit Analysis: Lessons from the Chilean National Investment System

Andrés Gómez-Lobo

1Department of Economics, University of Chile

Citation Information: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 2152-2812, DOI: 10.1515/2152-2812.1102, January 2012

Publication History:
Published Online:
2012-01-25

This paper discusses some institutional and procedural designs that can strengthen CBA as a decision making tool within the public sector. Our discussion is based on Chile’s National Public Investment System (SNI) the earliest and most consolidated investment appraisal system in Latin America. The objective of Chile’s SNI is to provide a coherent framework for identifying, coordinating, evaluating and implementing public investments. Chile’s SNI has several interesting institutional characteristics. For example, it standardizes project presentation formats, establishes explicit application and evaluation processes for public funds, provides general as well as sector specific methodological guidelines for CBA of projects and programs, and introduces a system of “checks and balances” by separating the institution that evaluates projects from the institutions promoting projects. Besides describing the system and highlighting the features we believe strengthen the use of project appraisal as a decision making tool. The paper also presents data on the number of projects appraised by sector, the overall results of appraisals and other administrative data, as well as a summary of ex-post studies for a sample of road, rural electricity, education and health projects. Unfortunately, the limited data available and the lack of a proper counterfactual scenario do not allow for strong conclusions to be made regarding the performance of the system. However, the data presented serves as an illustration of the Chilean system and it may be of value to researches in this field as well as to policymakers in other countries wishing to improve their public investment systems.

Keywords: project evaluation; infrastructure; cost-benefit analysis; institutional design

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.