The possibility of preference reversals according to the Kaldor-Hicks (KH) criterion in benefit-cost analysis has concerned economists since Scitovsky (1941) first published his results. Lawyers and philosophers have argued that the potential of reversals calls the use of benefit-cost analysis into question, implying elimination of its use. We demonstrate that reversals occur only with inferior goods in the case of static production possibilities and that reversals occur under changing production possibilities only when production possibilities frontiers cross, which is a myopic characterization that ignores practical cases of global production possibilities.
Editor-in-Chief: Farrow, Scott
3 Issues per year
Issues
Volume 4 (2013)
Volume 3 (2012)
Volume 2 (2011)
Volume 1 (2010)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis by Burgess, David F and Zerbe, Richard O
- Measuring The Social Opportunity Cost of Labor In Mexico by Guillermo-Peon, Sylvia B. and Harberger, Arnold C.
- Benefit-Cost Analysis for Drinking Water Standards: Efficiency, Equity, and Affordability Considerations in Small Communities by Raucher, Robert S./ Rubin, Scott J/ Crawford-Brown, Douglas and Lawson, Megan M.
- The Normative Implications of Political Decision-Making for Benefit-Cost Analysis by Krutilla, Kerry and Alexeev, Alexander
- A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Private and Semi-Private Hospital Rooms by Boardman, Anthony E and Forbes, Diane
Scitovsky Reversals and Practical Benefit-Cost Analysis
Richard E. Just / Andrew Schmitz / Richard O. Zerbe
1University of Maryland
1University of Florida
1University of Washington, Seattle
Citation Information: Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 2152-2812, DOI: 10.1515/2152-2812.1109, May 2012
Publication History:
- Published Online:
- 2012-05-08
Keywords: Scitovsky; inferior goods; crossing production possibility frontiers; benefit-cost analysis
Comments (0)