Volume 7 (2010)
Volume 6 (2009)
Volume 5 (2008)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Review of Building an Enterprise-Wide Business Continuity Program by Franklin, Charlotte
- Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions by Cutter, Susan L./ Burton, Christopher G. and Emrich, Christopher T.
- The 'Titanic Syndrome': Risk and Crisis Management on the Costa Concordia by Alexander, David E.
- Vulnerability of U.S. Cities to Environmental Hazards by Borden, Kevin A./ Schmidtlein, Mathew C./ Emrich, Christopher T./ Piegorsch, Walter W. and Cutter, Susan L.
- An Operational Framework for Resilience by Kahan, Jerome H./ Allen, Andrew C. and George, Justin K.
Realtime Testing of a Regional Poison Information Center's Disaster Plan
1Pittsburgh Poison Center
2University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Poison Center
Citation Information: Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages –, ISSN (Online) 1547-7355, DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1087, March 2005
- Published Online:
Background: When a mass contamination occurs, the poison centers responsibilities should be well-defined. A Regional Poison Information Center participated in a county-wide drill involving a mass contamination. Methods: Critique criteria included communication and notification processes, a RPICs ability to rapidly assess victim symptomatology and identify possible contaminants, utilization of the RPIC by area health care professionals and call volume surge capacity. All calls were to be documented. Results: Fifty percent (50%) of the involved health care facilities contacted the RPIC for treatment recommendations. Internal communications including notification of the RPIC director and medical director were appropriate. Reported symptoms were identified rapidly as being consistent with a nerve agent and/or a vesicant. A fact sheet was prepared by the director and, utilizing the pre-existing hospital notification program was faxed to all hospitals in the region. This drill identified a number of communications problems both within the RPIC hospital network as well as with government and public health agencies. Conclusion: The RPIC functioned efficiently during the drill process although communications were identified as a problem. Modifications were made and will be tested.