Journal of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems
Editor-in-Chief: Kabanikhin, Sergey I.
6 Issues per year
Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2013: 0.593
Rank 143 out of 299 in category Mathematics in the 2013 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.466
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.251
Mathematical Citation Quotient 2013: 0.51
Volume 22 (2014)
Volume 21 (2013)
Volume 20 (2012)
Volume 19 (2011)
Volume 18 (2011)
Volume 17 (2009)
Volume 16 (2008)
Volume 15 (2007)
Volume 14 (2006)
Volume 13 (2005)
Volume 12 (2004)
Volume 11 (2003)
Volume 10 (2002)
Volume 9 (2001)
Volume 8 (2000)
Volume 7 (1999)
Volume 6 (1998)
Volume 5 (1997)
Volume 4 (1996)
Volume 3 (1995)
Volume 2 (1994)
Most Downloaded Articles
- Chemnitz Symposium on Inverse ProblemsChemnitz, Germany, September 27–28, 2007 by Hofmann, B.
- Obituary of Alfredo Lorenzi
- A numerical study of heuristic parameter choice rules for total variation regularization by Kindermann, Stefan/ Mutimbu, Lawrence D. and Resmerita, Elena
- Carleman estimates for global uniqueness, stability and numerical methods for coefficient inverse problems by Klibanov, Michael V.
- Minisymposium — Recent progress in regularization theory by Neubauer, A.
Algorithm of finding a body projection within an absorbing and scattering medium
1Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Acad. Koptyug avenue, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia.
2Institute of Applied Mathematics, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 7 Radio street, 690041, Vladivostok, Russia.
Citation Information: Journal of Inverse and Ill-posed Problems. Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 885–893, ISSN (Online) 1569-3945, ISSN (Print) 0928-0219, DOI: 10.1515/jiip.2011.009, April 2011
- Published Online:
The problem of an arbitrary medium probing by use of radiation flux on the bases of the monoenergetic transport equation is considered. The medium is assumed to comprise some bodies, which radiation characteristics differ from ones of the medium. The outgoing radiation density flux is assumed to be measured at a plane nonintersecting the bodies whereas the boundaries of the body projections (shadows) on the plane are to be found. The case when the direct imaging of the objects is embarrassing owing to a strong scattering and absorption within the medium. The current work is being carried out under a special project so the limitations imposed have a specific character. More definite, these limitations are adopted to the problem of the world ocean near-bottom zone probing.