1Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Box 354350, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Citation Information:
Journal of Mathematical Cryptology.
Volume 5, Issue 3-4, Pages 205–224, ISSN (Online) 1862-2984, ISSN (Print) 1862-2976,
DOI: 10.1515/jmc-2011-0014,
January 2012
Publication History:
Received: 30/10/2011;
Revised: 01/12/2011;
Accepted: 05/12/2011;
Published Online: 28/02/2012
Abstract.
I continue the discussion initiated in part I (published in
this journal in 2007) of whether
or not computer-assisted proofs are a promising approach to
preventing errors in reductionist security arguments. I
examine some recent papers that describe automated
security proofs for hashed ElGamal encryption, Boneh–Franklin
identity-based encryption, and OAEP.
Comments (0)