Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

29,00 € / $41.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added.
Publication Date:
25 01 2012
ISSN:
1862-2984
DOI:
10.1515/jmc-2012-0001

See all formats and pricing

Print
List price
Euro [D] 363.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 545.00 *
Online
List price
Euro [D] 29.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 41.00 *
Print + Online
List price
Euro [D] 419.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 629.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added.

Managing Editor: Magliveras, Spyros S. / Steinwandt, Rainer / Trung, Tran

null Blackburn, Simon R. / Brickell, Ernie / Burmester, Mike / Cramer, Ronald / Dawson, Ed / Gilman, Robert / Gonzalez Vasco, Maria Isabel / Grosek, Otokar / Imai, Hideki / Kim, Kwangjo / Koblitz, Neal / Kurosawa, Kaoru / Menezes, Alfred / Mullin, Ron / Nguyen, Phong Q. / Pieprzyk, Josef / Safavi-Naini, Rei / Shparlinski, Igor / Stinson, Doug / Williams, Hugh C. / Yung, Moti

4 Issues per year

Mathematical Citation Quotient 2010: 0.31

On the Bringer–Chabanne EPIR protocol for polynomial evaluation

1Division of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, 637371, Singapore

2Division of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, 637371, Singapore

3Division of Mathematical Sciences, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, 637371, Singapore

Citation Information: Journal of Mathematical Cryptology. Volume 5, Issue 3-4, Pages 277–301, ISSN (Online) 1862-2984, ISSN (Print) 1862-2976, DOI: 10.1515/jmc-2012-0001, January 2012

Publication History:

Received: 04/05/2011;
Revised: 16/01/2012;
Published Online: 28/02/2012

Abstract.

Extended private information retrieval (EPIR) was defined by Bringer, Chabanne, Pointcheval and Tang at CANS 2007 and generalized by Bringer and Chabanne at AFRICACRYPT 2009. In the generalized setting, EPIR allows a user to evaluate a function on a database block such that the database can learn neither which function has been evaluated nor on which block the function has been evaluated and the user learns no more information on the database blocks except for the expected result. An EPIR protocol for evaluating polynomials over a finite field was proposed by Bringer and Chabanne in [Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 5580, Springer (2009), 305–322]. We show that the protocol does not satisfy the correctness requirement as they have claimed. In particular, we show that it does not give the user the expected result with large probability if one of the coefficients of the polynomial to be evaluated is primitive in and the others belong to the prime subfield of .

Keywords.: Extended private information retrieval; correctness

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.