The value of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting post-term pregnancy : Journal of Perinatal Medicine

www.degruyter.com uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience.
To understand more about cookies, tags, and tracking, see our Privacy Statement
I accept all cookies for the De Gruyter Online site

Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, M.J.M.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Ogata, Edward / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 1.358
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.597

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.731
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.687
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 1.483

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

The value of ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting post-term pregnancy

Antonella Vimercati / Pantaleo Greco / PierLuigi Lopalco / Vera Loizzi / Marco Scioscia / Loredana Mei / Angela Cristina Rossi / Luigi Selvaggi

Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 317–321, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2001.045, June 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-06-01

Abstract

Object: To assess whether transvaginal ultrasound is helpful in predicting the post-term onset of labor (≥ 1 weeks).

Setting: Antenatal clinic of a University hospital and referral center.

Subject and mehods: One hundred and twenty singleton uncomplicated pregnancies in primiparous women were enrolled at 37 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound examination of the cervical length by a transvaginal probe was performed at recruitment and at weekly intervals until 40 completed weeks. Subjects were divided into Group A (those with spontaneous onset of labor ≤ 1 completed weeks) and Group B (those not in labor by that date).

Results: Eighty women delivered ≤ 41 completed weeks, forty were not in labor by that date. The cervix was significantly shorter at 39 and 40 weeks in group A, but no particular cervical length was predictive of post-term delivery.

Discussion: There is a significant difference in cervical length in women delivering at term compared with those due to have a post-term delivery. This difference is significant from 39 weeks of gestation onwards. We speculate that targeted transvaginal ultrasound may be useful in predicting the post-term onset of labor and possibly in assisting its active management.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
L. Sonnier, P. Bouhanna, C. Arnou, and P. Rozenberg
Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2014, Volume 42, Number 12, Page 827
[2]
Young Hoon Suh, Kyo Hoon Park, Joon-Seok Hong, and Jae Hong Noh
Journal of Korean Medical Science, 2007, Volume 22, Number 1, Page 89
[3]
M. Meijer-Hoogeveen, C. Van Holsbeke, I. Van Der Tweel, P. Stoutenbeek, and G. H. A. Visser
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, Volume 32, Number 5, Page 652
[4]
P. Rozenberg
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, Volume 32, Number 2, Page 126
[5]
P. Vankayalapati, F. Sethna, N. Roberts, N. Ngeh, B. Thilaganathan, and A. Bhide
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, Volume 31, Number 3, Page 328
[6]
L L Tolaymat, V H Gonzalez-Quintero, L Sanchez-Ramos, A Kaunitz, P Wludyka, M J O'Sullivan, and D Martin
Journal of Perinatology, 2007, Volume 27, Number 12, Page 749
[7]
E. Strobel, P. Sladkevicius, L. Rovas, F. De Smet, E. Dejin Karlsson, and L. Valentin
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006, Volume 28, Number 3, Page 298

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.