Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, M.J.M.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 1.358
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.597

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.731
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.687
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 1.483

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

A kick from within – fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care

J. F. Frøen

Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 13–24, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2004.003, June 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-06-01

Abstract

Interest for maternal fetal movement counting as a method of screening for fetal well-being boomed during the 1970s and 1980s. Several reports demonstrated that the introduction of counting charts significantly reduced stillbirth rates. However, in 1989, a large study appeared in The Lancet that annihilated research in this field by deeming charts ineffective. In retrospect, it seems evidence was lacking. This review revisits the subject of the significance of fetal movement counting in predicting outcome and reducing stillbirth rates. A structured search was performed to identify studies relating to pregnancy outcome and its association with maternal perception of fetal movements. Suspected preliminary or redundant material was excluded. Only publications from Western countries dating from after 1970 were included. Twenty-four studies were identified. Available data demonstrate that reduced fetal movements are associated with adverse pregnancy outcome, both in high and low risk pregnancies. Increased vigilance towards maternal perception of movements (e.g. by performing movement counting studies) reduces stillbirth rates, in particular stillbirths deemed avoidable. While screening for fetal well-being by maternal fetal movement counting can reduce fetal mortality rates, a resurrection in research activity is urgently needed to optimize its benefits.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Annie McArdle, Vicki Flenady, Jocelyn Toohill, Jenny Gamble, and Debra Creedy
Women and Birth, 2015, Volume 28, Number 1, Page 54
[2]
H. Zisser, L. Jovanovic, A. Thorsell, A. Kupperman, L. J Taylor, P. Ospina, and M. Hod
Diabetes Care, 2006, Volume 29, Number 1, Page 63
[3]
Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh, Mahdi Sheikh, Mamak Shariat, and Zahra Farahani
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2015, Volume 28, Number 6, Page 713
[4]
Caroline Signore, Roger K. Freeman, and Catherine Y. Spong
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009, Volume 113, Number 3, Page 687
[5]
Mari-Cristin Malm, Helena Lindgren, Christine Rubertsson, Ingegerd Hildingsson, and Ingela Rådestad
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2014, Volume 5, Number 1, Page 31
[6]
B. Boashash, M.S. Khlif, T. Ben-Jabeur, C.E. East, and P.B. Colditz
Digital Signal Processing, 2014, Volume 25, Page 134
[7]
Jo Røislien and Brita Winje
Statistics in Medicine, 2013, Volume 32, Number 21, Page 3660
[9]
Andrea M. Peat, Tomasina Stacey, Robin Cronin, and Lesley M. E. McCowan
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2012, Volume 52, Number 5, Page 445
[10]
Ingela Rådestad and Helena Lindgren
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2012, Volume 3, Number 3, Page 113
[11]
Ingela Rådestad
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2010, Volume 1, Number 4, Page 119
[12]
Eli Saastad, Brita A. Winje, Pravin Israel, and J. Frederik Frøen
Birth, 2012, Volume 39, Number 1, Page 10
[13]
Ingela Rådestad
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2012, Volume 3, Number 2, Page 59
[14]
KERSTIN ERLANDSSON, HELENA LINDGREN, ANNA DAVIDSSON-BREMBORG, and INGELA RÅDESTAD
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2012, Volume 91, Number 1, Page 28
[15]
Eli Saastad, Pravin Israel, Tone Ahlborg, Nina Gunnes, and J. Frederik Frøen
Birth, 2011, Volume 38, Number 4, Page 282
[16]
Niamh Daly, Donal Brennan, Michael Foley, and Colm O’Herlihy
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2011, Volume 159, Number 1, Page 57
[17]
ANNEMIEKE C.C. EVERS, PETER G.J. NIKKELS, HENS A.A. BROUWERS, JANINE BOON, ANNEKE van EGMOND-LINDEN, CLAARTJE HART, YVETTE S. SNUIF, SIETSKE STERKEN-HOOISMA, HEIN W. BRUINSE, and ANNEKE KWEE
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2011, Volume 90, Number 12, Page 1416
[18]
J. Frederik Frøen, Julie Victoria Holm Tveit, Eli Saastad, Per E. Børdahl, Babill Stray-Pedersen, Alexander E.P. Heazell, Vicki Flenady, and Ruth C. Fretts
Seminars in Perinatology, 2008, Volume 32, Number 4, Page 307
[19]
Eiji Ryo, Kyoko Nishihara, Sachiyo Matsumoto, and Hideo Kamata
Medical Engineering & Physics, 2012, Volume 34, Number 5, Page 566
[21]
James F. King and Rosemary A. Warren
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2006, Volume 11, Number 2, Page 79
[22]
Ruth C. Fretts
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005, Volume 193, Number 6, Page 1923
[24]
Gordon CS Smith and Ruth C Fretts
The Lancet, 2007, Volume 370, Number 9600, Page 1715
[25]
Lois Jovanovic
Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders, 2005, Volume 3, Number 3, Page 233
[26]
Avital Skornick-Rapaport, Sharon Maslovitz, Michael Kupferminc, Joseph B. Lessing, and Ariel Many
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2011, Volume 24, Number 4, Page 610
[27]
Uma M. Reddy
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007, Volume 110, Number 5, Page 1151
[28]
Olufemi T. OLADAPO, Daniel A. ADEKANLE, and Bankole O. DUROJAIYE
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007, Volume 47, Number 5, Page 383
[29]
S J Robson and L R Leader
Journal of Perinatology, 2010, Volume 30, Number 5, Page 305
[30]
R Moslehi, C Signore, D Tamura, JL Mills, JJ DiGiovanna, MA Tucker, J Troendle, T Ueda, J Boyle, SG Khan, K-S Oh, AM Goldstein, and KH Kraemer
Clinical Genetics, 2010, Volume 77, Number 4, Page 365
[31]
Vicki FLENADY, Julie MacPHAIL, Glenn GARDENER, Yogesh CHADHA, Kassam MAHOMED, Alexander HEAZELL, Ruth FRETTS, and Frederik FRØEN
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2009, Volume 49, Number 4, Page 358
[32]
Zina Rashed Hijazi and Christine Elizabeth East
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 2009, Volume 64, Number 7, Page 489

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.