Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, M.J.M.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

6 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2014: 1.358
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.597

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.782
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.928

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Fetal scalp pH and ST analysis of the fetal ECG as an adjunct to cardiotocography to predict fetal acidosis in labor / A multi-center, case controlled study

Håkan Norén1 / Andreas K. Luttkus2 / Jens H. Stupin3 / Sofia Blad4 / Sabaratnam Arulkumaran5 / Risto Erkkola6 / Roberto Luzietti7 / Gerard H.A. Visser8 / Branka Yli9 / Karl G. Rosén10

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatal Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

2Clinic of Obstetrics, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

3Clinic of Obstetrics, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany

4Department of Physiology, Perinatal Center, University of Gothenburg and Neoventa Medical AB, Gothenburg, Sweden

5Department of Obstetrics, St Georges Medical School, London, UK

6Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, University of Turku, Finland

7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Perugia, Italy

8Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Norway

10Department of Physiology, Perinatal Center, University of Gothenburg and Neoventa Medical AB, Gothenburg, Sweden

Corresponding author: Håkan Norén, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Perinatal Center Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden

Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 408–414, ISSN (Online) 16193997, ISSN (Print) 03005577, DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2007.097, August 2007

Publication History

Received:
2006-12-03
Revised:
2007-05-21
Accepted:
2007-07-09
Published Online:
2007-08-09

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relationship between scalp pH (FBS) and ST analysis in situations of acidosis with special emphasis on the timing of cardiotocography (CTG), FBS and ST changes during labor.

Study design: From a European Union multicenter study on clinical implementation of the STAN methodology, 911 cases were identified where a scalp-pH had been obtained. In 53 cases, marked cord artery acidosis was found (cord artery pH<7.06) and 44 cases showed moderate acidemia at birth (pH 7.06–7.09). Comparisons were made with 97 control cases (pH≥7.20).

Results: Of those cases with FHR+ST events recorded within 16 min of delivery, 61% (17/28) had a cord artery pH≥7.20. The corresponding figure for cases where STAN indications occurred for more than 16 min was 19% (13/69) (OR 6.66, 2.53–17.55, P<0.001). Out of the 121 cases with an abnormal CTG, 84 (69%) showed a cord artery pH of <7.10. STAN indicated abnormality in 83% (70 out of 84). The corresponding figure for scalp pH<7.20 was 43% (36/84). In the case of CTG changes at the start of an adequate recording STAN guidelines provided information on developing acidosis in all cases but one (16 out of 17) in the marked acidosis group. STAN guidelines indicated abnormality prior to an abnormal FBS in 14 out of 17 cases. The median duration between STAN indications to intervention and an abnormal FBS was 29 (95% CI 11–74) min.

Conclusions: ST analysis, as an adjunct to CTG, identifies adverse fetal conditions during labor similar to that of FBS but on a more consistent basis. The timing of CTG+ST changes relates to the level of acidosis at birth.

Keywords: Acidosis; anaerobic metabolism; fetal blood sampling; fetal heart rate; myocardial glycogen; scalp-pH; STAN methodology

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Isis Amer-Wahlin and Anneke Kwee
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015
[2]
J.E. Martín López, C. Beltrán Calvo, and R. Rodríguez López
Clínica e Investigación en Ginecología y Obstetricia, 2014
[3]
Kalpana Ragupathy
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, Volume 291, Number 1, Page 9
[4]
Dragoş-Daniel Ţarălungă, Georgeta-Mihaela Ungureanu, Ilinca Gussi, Rodica Strungaru, and Werner Wolf
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2014, Volume 2014, Page 1
[5]
Jörg Kessler, Dag Moster, and Susanne Albrechtsen
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2014, Volume 93, Number 2, Page 175
[6]
James F. Smith
Postgraduate Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2008, Volume 28, Number 19, Page 1
[7]
J.-M. Thoulon and M. Doret
EMC - Obstétrique, 2013, Volume 8, Number 1, Page 1
[8]
JÖRG KESSLER, DAG MOSTER, and SUSANNE ALBRECHTSEN
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2013, Volume 92, Number 1, Page 75
[9]
ANETTE SALMELIN, INGELA WIKLUND, ROGER BOTTINGA, BENGT BRORSSON, GUNVOR EKMAN-ORDEBERG, EVA ENEROTH GRIMFORS, ULF HANSON, MAY BLOM, and ELISABETH PERSSON
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2013, Volume 92, Number 1, Page 28
[10]
PARISA MOKARAMI, NANA WIBERG, and PER OLOFSSON
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2012, Volume 91, Number 5, Page 574
[11]
Mercedes Valverde Pareja, Alberto Puertas Prieto, María Paz Carrillo Badillo, Isabel Pérez Herrezuelo, and Francisco Montoya Ventoso
Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 2010, Volume 53, Number 4, Page 141
[12]
PER OLOFSSON, PARISA MOKARAMI, KARIN KÄLLÉN, and NANA WIBERG
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2012, Volume 91, Number 1, Page 39
[13]
Mercedes Valverde, Alberto M. Puertas, María F. Lopez-Gallego, María P. Carrillo, María T. Aguilar, and Francisco Montoya
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2011, Volume 159, Number 2, Page 333
[14]
Branka M. Yli, Grete A. Birkeland Kro, Svein Rasmussen, Janette Khoury, Håkan Norèn, Isis Amer-Wåhlin, Ola Didrik Saugstad, and Babill Stray-Pedersen
Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2012, Volume 40, Number 2
[15]
I. Amer-Wåhlin and K. Maršál
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2011, Volume 16, Number 1, Page 29
[16]
James F Smith
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008, Volume 20, Number 2, Page 152
[17]
M Melin, A Bonnevier, M Cardell, L Hogan, and A Herbst
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2008, Volume 115, Number 13, Page 1669
[18]
HÅKAN NORÉN and KARL G ROSÉN
Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review, 2008, Volume 19, Number 04, Page 325

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.