Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, M.J.M.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, MD, PhD, HonD, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, MD, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

6 Issues per year

Increased IMPACT FACTOR 2012: 1.949
Rank 29 out of 77 in category Obstretics & Gynecology and 39 out of 121 in category Pediatrics in the 2012 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Pregnant women's perception of cesarean section on demand

Sibil Tschudin1 / Judith Alder1 / Stephanie Hendriksen1 / Johannes Bitzer1 / Karoline Aebi Popp1 / Rosanna Zanetti1 / Irene Hösli1 / Wolfgang Holzgreve1 / Verena Geissbühler2

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Basel, Switzerland

2Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Switzerland

Corresponding author: Sibil Tschudin, MD Division of Social Medicine and Psychosomatics Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Basel Spitalstrasse 21 CH-4031 Basel Switzerland Tel.: +41 61 325 90 67 Fax: +41 61 325 90 35

Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 251–256, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2009.042, February 2009

Publication History

Received:
2008-07-18
Revised:
2008-09-30
Accepted:
2008-10-07
Published Online:
2009-02-06

Abstract

Aims: To assess pregnant women's awareness of and attitudes towards cesarean section (CS) on demand, as well as to identify specific target groups by focusing on differences dependant on the participants' background, parity and intended mode of delivery.

Methods: The study was conducted at two centers during three months. German-speaking pregnant women were invited to answer an anonymous, structured questionnaire. We compared urban vs. rural, nulliparous vs. parous and women opting for a CS vs. denying this wish, with regard to awareness and attitudes towards CS on demand.

Results: Ninety-two percent of the 201 participants were aware of the possibility to deliver by CS on demand. Their sources of information were mostly print media reports, television, or friends. Pain avoidance and missing the birth experience were the main reasons for and against CS on demand, respectively. For women opting for CS on demand, traumatically-experienced previous birth and the child's well-being were other important reasons for a CS.

Conclusions: Because negative birth experience appears to be decisive for pregnant women's attitude towards CS on demand and their perception of CS seems to be partly based on misconceptions, antenatal counseling should focus on these aspects.

Keywords: Antenatal counseling; birth experience; cesarean section on demand; decision making; perception of cesarean section on demand; pregnant women

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content. Please, subscribe or login to access all content.