Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

Online

99,00 € / $149.00*

* Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.
Publication Date:
February 2010
ISSN:
1619-3997
DOI:
10.1515/jpm.2010.023

See all formats and pricing

Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 99.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 149.00 *
Print
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 744.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1116.00 *
Print + Online
Individual Subscription Online only
Euro [D] 893.00
RRP for USA, Canada, Mexico
US$ 1340.00 *
*Prices subject to change. Shipping costs will be added if applicable.

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Aslam, Muhammad / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Brezinka, Christoph / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / Dimitrou, G. / Foulon, Walter / Grunebaum, G. E. / Harding, Jane / Hentschel, Roland / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, M.J.M.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Makatsariya, Alexander / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Geijn, Herman P. / Vetter, Klaus / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland / Köpcke, W.

6 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2011: 1.702
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.779
Rank 36 out of 79 in category Obstretics and Gynecology and 45 out of 113 in category Pediatrics in the 2011 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Science Edition

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Acceptability of the fetal electrocardiographic (STAN®) monitoring system by staff at a high risk maternity unit

Maryam Parisaei1 / Kevin F. Harrington2 / Katrina J. Erskine3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Queen Mary and Westfield, University of London, UK

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Homerton Row, London, E9 6SR, UK

Corresponding author: Maryam Parisaei, MRCOG Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing University College Hospital 235 Euston Road London NW1 2BU UK

Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine. Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 187–190, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: 10.1515/jpm.2010.023, February 2010

Publication History:
Received:
2009-03-29
Revised:
2009-08-02
Accepted:
2009-10-07
Published Online:
2010-02-02

Abstract

Aims: To assess staff acceptability of STAN® monitoring system.

Methods: This was a prospective study of health care professionals involved in the first 18 months of STAN® use at a high risk maternity unit.

Results: During the study period 75% of midwives and 80% of doctors questioned felt confident when interpreting STAN® cases. A total of 88% of midwives and 90% of doctors felt adequately supported in their actual clinical use of the system. Of all the obstetricians who used the STAN®, 95% felt it was an acceptable alternative to fetal blood sampling. One of the main complaints was poor signal quality which occurred in 16% of cases. As many as 97% of doctors and 96% of midwives considered STAN® to be an acceptable way of monitoring high risk women after its introduction.

Conclusions: Introduction of a new monitoring system to a high risk labor ward is possible, and acceptable to its staff. Constant practical and theoretical support and adherence to strict, easily understood guidelines is required.

Keywords: Acceptability; intrapartum monitoring; STAN® monitoring

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.