Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

European Science Foundation ranking A

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2014: 0.161
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2014: 0.421
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2014: 0.115

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Bernard Bolzano, Analyticity and the Aristotelian Model of Science

Willem R de Jong1

1

Citation Information: Kant Studien. Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages 328–349, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: 10.1515/kant.92.3.328, February 2008

Publication History

Published Online:
2008-02-28

Abstract

Quine's well-known ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ (1951) plays a key role in the debate about the analytic-synthetic distinction. Taking to task the ideas of Carnap in particular, Quine shows that logical positivism works with a concept of scientific rationality that is based dogmatically on, among other things, the opposition analytic-synthetic.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Arianna Betti and Hein van den Berg
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2014, Volume 22, Number 4, Page 812
[2]
Sandra Lapointe
Synthese, 2010, Volume 174, Number 2, Page 263

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.