Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation

European Science Foundation ranking A

Kant-Studien

Philosophische Zeitschrift der Kant-Gesellschaft

Ed. by Baum, Manfred / Dörflinger, Bernd / Klemme, Heiner F.

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.112
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 0.208

VolumeIssuePage

Issues

Kant, Herbart and Riemann

Erik C. Banks

Citation Information: Kant-Studien. Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 208–234, ISSN (Online) 1613-1134, ISSN (Print) 0022-8877, DOI: 10.1515/kant.2005.96.2.208, September 2005

Publication History

Published Online:
2005-09-06

Abstract

Introduction

Johann Friedrich Herbart (1776–1841) succeeded to Kant’s chair at Königsberg in 1809. He is known today as a philosopher of education and as a seminal psychologist; but in the 19th century, Herbart’s metaphysics and psychology had an extraordinary, still largely undocumented, influence on science and mathematics. Bernhard Riemann, in his famous 1854 Probevorlesung on geometry, named as his influences only C. F. Gauss and “some philosophical investigations of Herbart”. Hermann Grassmann’s groundbreaking Ausdehnungslehre (1844) was influenced by Herbart. And Ernst Mach, the Austrian physicist-philosopher, was a devoted Herbartian in his youth, whose theory of space drew on Herbart’s Metaphysik. In his Knowledge and Error, Mach referred to Herbart’s metaphysics as a model for a “chemical manifold” of energies (electromagnetic, gravitational and thermal) for a future physics, mature enough to dispense with space:

Our intuitions of space and time form the most important foundations of our sensory view of the world and as such cannot be eliminated. However this does not prevent us from trying to reduce the manifold of qualities of place-sensations to a physiological-chemical manifold. We might think of a system of mixtures in all proportions of a number of chemical qualities (processes). If such an attempt were one day to succeed, it would lead also to the question whether we might not give a physical sense to the speculations that Herbart, following Leibniz, conducted as regards the construction of intelligible space, so that we might reduce physical space to concepts of quality and magnitude. There is of course much to be objected to in Herbart’s metaphysics. His tracking down of contradictions that are in part artificially contrived and his eleatic tendencies are none too attractive, but he will hardly have produced nothing but errors.

What in the metaphysics and psychology of this “minor” philosopher made such an impression on three first-class minds of the nineteenth century?

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Erik C. Banks
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2013, Volume 44, Number 1, Page 20
[2]
Hans-Joachim Petsche
Mathematische Semesterberichte, 2012, Volume 59, Number 2, Page 183
[3]
Matthias Neuber
British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2012, Volume 20, Number 1, Page 163
[4]

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.